Theos-Talk Archives (October 2003 Message tt00028)

The post often refer to associative mental projection of symbols an 
philosophies in string context in such a way as to allow a multitude 
of possible associations . Often it has been recommended for those 
that whish to gather a greater insight into the string to break up 
the text an translate the concept as one might do a string of 
hieroglyphs or translation of another language, to modernize the 
message into a comprised translation.
Many of my inspirations have been from rough translation of 
philosophical text de rerum natura, emerald tablet come to mind , 
also my work with linguistic measures of translation of maya 
hieroglyphics an complete fascination of the properties of symbols.
Also I must say that The SD has inspired many different levels of 
association an more specifically generalizations as universal symbols 
in my own work . And as a contribution to the list further an method 
of approach that has been gather from the level of abstracted ness of 
the SD. Ideas presented in the sd often are jumble associations in my 
eyes meant also to be interpreted in such a way . From the 
perspective of natural attraction an an commonalities to the 
individual self an influences to gather a collection of personal 
strings such as archetypes mythological concepts and associated 
concepts often symbols introducing relative personal idealization 
adopting personal beliefs philosophies crossing a multitude of 
cultural understandings an beliefs . Multi facetting archetypical 
explorations for instance toum shiva hea taking in example the ideal 
human potential being the essence of any archetype . The brahmin an 
para this that an not as such their is just so many accurate 
personalized concepts to be adopted an as such the leading role of 
human potential is in our ability to adapt personalize an build .

Understandably the majority may not understand the reason or even my 
reasoning though it must be said that I just cant think of a reason 
why not.

And I would like to thank the list for keeping an open mind an 
appreaceation for the work .

respectfully
-Og






> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:43:20 EDT
> From: MarieMAJ41@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Re:What is This?
>
> In a message dated 10/2/2003 12:52:30 PM Central Daylight Time,
> Nisk98114@aol.com writes:
> : 1
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:11:24 EDT
> From: MarieMAJ41@aol.com
> Subject: What is this?
>
> I'm not sure what this is or what it means. Do people send individuals e-mail
>
>
> from theo-talk, or is this a spam?
> Marie
> //////////////////////////////////////////////
> Oraganon is a regular contributor to the Theos world list.You may read it or
> discard it.
> Well, I must say that my introduction to this group has been singular to say
> the least. I am getting more information, but am still puzzled? What was
> Oraganon's real message and intent? I guess I'm not good with subtleties.
> Thanks.
> Marie
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Oraganon could, perhaps, find last year's? archive and produce some of the
> posts that involved some explanations and exchanges on his contributions?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/