Theos-Talk Archives (August 2003 Message tt00091)

Aug 19 2003

Dear Mauri

Of course I am not including you as any kind of a threat.

There can be no actual threat to that which is deathless and
eternal. How can an immutable law or the expression of the
nature of such a law be threatened ?

The subject line I paid little attention to was already adopted
and placed there by someone else. I was responding to the
content.

So thanks but let me make sure you understand me also.

Dal

-----------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Mauri [mailto:mhart@idirect.ca]
Sent:	Monday, August 18, 2003 8:24 PM
To:	theos-talk@yahoogroups.com; Theosophy Study List;
study@blavatsky.net
Subject:	Theos-World re Dallas's "RE: Mauri and threats to
Theosophy"

Aug 18, Dallas wrote: <<RE: Mauri and threats to Theosophy>>
That was
on the subject line.

Dallas, I wonder if you could be more specific about what you
mean by
that statement, in that it occurred to me that, based on your
"Mauri
and threats," there, that some people might interpret that to
mean
that you're lumping me together with various "threats to
Theosophy"...

And thanks for the tip about:

<<If you want a clear unbiased fully documented History of modern
Theosophy I recommend The THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT (1875-1950)>>

They have a collection of those at the TS library here. Will
be
ckecking.

And I tended to agree with your:

<<* Esoteric is quite transcendent but as it is not recoded it
belongs to the Buddhi-manasic level of perception.
* * If recorded it is limited and perhpas becomes distorted. It
is
an expression of Law as I see it. Our perception of it is always
interior to each of us. It is like the symbol H P B traced
after
her initials in the 1st Vol of The SECRET DOCTRINE book she
dedicated
to Bertram K. The universal vision of MANAS united to Buddhi and
Atma. Interpretations, if arguable are thus possibly deficient.>>

Best wishes,
Mauri




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/