Theos-Talk Archives (August 2003 Message tt00090)

Aug 18, Dallas wrote: <<RE: Mauri and threats to Theosophy>> That was
on the subject line.

Dallas, I wonder if you could be more specific about what you mean by
that statement, in that it occurred to me that, based on your "Mauri
and threats," there, that some people might interpret that to mean
that you're lumping me together with various "threats to Theosophy"...

And thanks for the tip about:

<<If you want a clear unbiased fully documented History of modern
Theosophy I recommend The THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT (1875-1950)>>

They have a collection of those at the TS library here. Will be 
ckecking.

And I tended to agree with your:

<<* Esoteric is quite transcendent but as it is not recoded it
belongs to the Buddhi-manasic level of perception.
* * If recorded it is limited and perhpas becomes distorted. It is
an expression of Law as I see it. Our perception of it is always
interior to each of us. It is like the symbol H P B traced after
her initials in the 1st Vol of The SECRET DOCTRINE book she dedicated
to Bertram K. The universal vision of MANAS united to Buddhi and
Atma. Interpretations, if arguable are thus possibly deficient.>>

Best wishes,
Mauri