Theos-Talk Archives (July 2003 Message tt00012)

Hi. This is not a response to you in particular, Morton, but a general
comment on this subject. If we look back too much and in the wrong way, we
will turn into pillars of salt, as in the story of Sodom and Gommorah. There
is no way to balance things by doing this, and the imbalance leads to more
analysis and a further attachment to material. It is a maze and there is no
way out. It has nothing to do with me and my opinions whether this is true
or not. It is a law in that a certain approach can only lead to a certain
kind and quality of result.

Moreover, re the Madame Blavatsky's material including the letters of the
Mahatmas, whether they be real or fake, being time-appropriate. It is most
interesting that I have had to present this idea to anyone who is an
educated theosophist and that this idea originally encountered so much
resistance (though this seems to be gradually changing) and that so much
hostility was expressed toward me for doing so, as this is so obvious and
any good scholar of this kind of material could see it at first glance.
Moreover, it is my opinion that until this idea is understood and accepted,
things will be log jammed to a very large extent and people will miss the
opportunity to use what is appropriate for this time and age from Madame
Blavatsky's teachings and apply it to the formation of a univeral
brotherhood. To put it gently, there is a good chance that the Blavatsky
material has lost a lot of its baraka. This is not good or bad, in that it
always happens and is to be expected, but unless this is accounted for,
there is going to be a lot of wasted effort and a continued pouring from the
empty into the void. What is baraka and how is it created? I believe this
has something to do with a conscious aim in relationship to the physical
substances that are created and emanated from a certain individual or
individuals as a result of the making of a conscious effort to realize this
aim. It is a most interesting subject and Morton does seem to be pointing us
in the direction of exploring this. For now, maybe it is at least something
to ponder about. Sincerely, Wry

----- Original Message -----
From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@adslhome.dk>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Blavatsky/Theosophy Websites & Resources


> Hi Daniel and all of you,
>
> My views are only views:
>
> I was searching a little and I got this page:
> http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/on_shearman.html
>
> I think it proves, that one just should NOT blindly rely on any of the
> Mahatma Letters to
> be true or untrue in any manner what so ever.
>
> That is just my conclusion.
>
> Feel free to agree or disagree...etc...
>
>
> from
> M. Sufilight with peace and love...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
> To: ".DanielHCaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:16 AM
> Subject: Theos-World Blavatsky/Theosophy Websites & Resources
>
>
> > I've updated the following useful webpage:
> >
> > "Blavatsky/Theosophy Websites & Resources"
> > http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/hpblinks.htm
> >
> > Feedback welcomed!
> >
> > Daniel H. Caldwell
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>