Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00142)

I find the following paragraph written by Wry to be quite interesting:

"It is not necessary to continue to use Madame Blavatsky as a 
reference point. This is not to say to disregard her work either, but 
if you (or anyone) consider yourself a 'theosophist, continue the 
quest in the most efficient way possible. The mind gets too dull when 
it keeps looking back. As I have said before, because I am from the 
same society as Madame Blavatsky, I am both capable and qualified to 
speak as her representative. But anybody can say anything. I have 
made this point plain. This is why it is necessary to begin to verify 
and not just to give it lip service, as certain hypocrites do. Re 
your own interesting attempt to formulate certain concepts, if I 
think human society approaches material in a certain way, I need to 
see this in myself, as I am most likely an example of this (and this 
means Wry, also) This approach is at the crux of receiving any real 
results. In any case, I personally speak for MADAME BLAVATSKY when I 
say she would not want immature modern 'theosophists' to be handling 
her material in the way they are doing. It is most saddening. 
Sincerely, Wry"

I'm a little puzzled by Wry's statement:

"I am from the same society as Madame Blavatsky. . . ."

What does that mean?

Daniel