Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00133)

Tuesday, June 17, 2003

RE: Evidence Of Petrified Giant Remains From Atlantis?
References to research

Dear Friends:


In my post yesterday, I gave directions: The reference is to
Dr. Hubbard's discoveries and the photographs and details are at
2 places:

1	at the archives of the Geology Dept. University of California
in San Francisco and

2	at the archives of the Dept. of Geology in Washington D C [
also LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ]

I also gave reference to THEOSOPHY Magazine volumes.

Here are the page numbers if someone is interested in reading and
tracing these down.


THEOSOPHY Magazine
Dr. Hubbard	Dr. Osborn
------------------------------------	--------------------------
---

Vol. 11, pp. 386, 526	Osborn p. 191
12 377
13	281, 360, 402-3 Osborn p. 567
14	380
16	.	. Osborn p. 236
17	235-7, 777-8
25	138-9
34	357, 439,
35	184
37	38,
55	313

also

S D II 9, 154, 224, 276-8, 293, 335-8, 340-1, 345-8, 365, 409,
752-3, 755,

Isis U I p. 120, 304,

LUCIFER Magazine 10, 358,
13, 91
7	436

Best wishes,

Dallas

============================

-----Original Message-----
From: Mauri
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:47 PM
To:
Subject: Dallas, evidence of GIANTS from Atlantis?

Dallas wrote, partly: <<Apparently the man-figure was
about 27 feet long, the woman-figure about 24, and the
child was about 18 feet long. >>



Thanks for all that, Dallas. And I suppose the
mainstream archeologists are saying they're all just so
many special weather balloons that, after crashing,
seem to have a curious habit of forming debris fields in
the shape of giant people ... ? Or something like that,
maybe?

-----------------------------------------

DTB	Get and read a copy of FORBIDDEN ARCHAEOLOGY - Thomas (?)
Published a few years ago in San Diego.

Also a 2nd volume recording the responses to that book.

-----------------------------------------


So where can we all take a look at those pictures of the
giants, Dallas... Or is it that they were so embarrasing to the
mainstream archeologists, Churches, scientists and
governments that they had them destroyed long ago?

Speculatively,
Mauri

================================


Dallas wrote:

Dear Mauri


Around 1922 and on to about 1926 reports came in of
the discovery of calcified (petrified) remains of three giant
humans.


They were at the bottom of the Havasupai
canyon a branch of the Grand Canyon in Arizona.
Photographs and details were taken and preserved in
San Francisco and in Washington in the archives of
the Dept. of Geology.


The Professor of Geology and
anthropology at the University of California San
Francisco, Dr Hubbard and another Mr. Osborn did
the discovering, investigating and measuring.


I found in old issues of THEOSOPHY Magazine
[Vols 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, and 34 references to these.
1923-46. ] The discovery was interrupted and then
terminated by a large landslide in the canyon that
obliterated the area. It was massive and too large to try
to remove.


But the reports and photographs exist in the
archives of both institutions. Apparently the
man-figure was about 27 feet long, the woman-figure
about 24, and the child was about 18 feet long.


The petrified figures were exposed on a ledge near the
bottom of the canyon and were partly buried inside the
material of the wall of the canyon above.


My father had pictures of these and I saw those when I
was about 18.


I have also heard of the footprints in Carson
City, and I seem to recall a recent issue of NATIONAL
GEOGRAPHIC Magazine that reproduced them or
some others similar to those, probably in the last 10
years. [ see S D II 755 ]

Hope this helps,


Dallas