re A.L. Cleather re HPB and her detractors
May 18, 2003 07:36 AM
by Mauri
Just finished reading Alice Leighton Cleather's "H.P.
Blavatsky As I Knew Her" (published in 1923) and
thought it a fascinating book. In it, I found some rather
mind boggling statements from Cleather about A.
Besant, Sinnet, Leadbeater and others, and how they
went about distributing karma (as it were, or
"undermining," if you prefer ... ?) re HPB and her
version of Theosophy.
Here's some excerpts, between <<>> (watch out for
OCR typos, and the paragraphs here are not necessarily
consecutive):
<<.... a posthumous work by Mr. A. P. Sinnett1—who
died in 1921—was given to the world by the
Theosophical Publishing House, Ltd., London, which
is, of course, under the aegis of Mrs. Besant. The nature
of the book itself makes the fact of its publication by
this House a surprising and somewhat anomalous one,
since it obviously aims at destroying entirely the bona
fides of H. P. Blavatsky, and of holding her up to the
scorn and reprobation of posterity as nothing more than
an ordinary medium, and a fraudulent one at that. From
Mrs. Besant's point of view, however (for we may, I
think, dismiss the preliminary " Note " as a clumsy
piece of camouflage), its appearance at this juncture in
the history of her " Theosophical Church," as Lord
Ronaldshay has called it, is far from inopportune and,
from that point of view. explains much.
The opportunity offered by my friend Mrs. Laura
Langford (whom we all knew so well in the eighties as
"Laura Holloway ") to contribute my recollections of
H. P. B. to her forthcoming book was a very welcome
one. I had always wished to testify publicly to my
Teacher’s greatness of Soul and her unique and
wonderful personality. I say "her," but one felt no
suggestion of the feminine in her, or of the masculine
either, for that natter. Rather an overwhelming
realisation that here was one of those rare Souls whose
grandeur of purpose escapes lesser mortals, and who are
consequently almost unvariably misunderstood, and
but too often hated. For of such a poor, mean quality
is the stuff compounded which we call our "selves,"
being ignorant of what our real " selves" are ; and this
H. P. B. came to show us.
It was at this time, about 1887-8, that I lost the
friendship of Mr. and Mrs. Sinnett, who had from the
very first treated me with so much courtesy and
kindness. They would neither of them ever consent to
listen to my explanation of what had occurred.
Incidentally, however, it showed me that {neither of
them really believed in H. P. B., or in the powers she
possessed. Often I used to go to their house in
Ladbroke Gardens (London, W.), on Mrs. Sinnett's "
At Home " day—Tuesday— and take Lansdowne Road on
my way back to the station, en route for Harrow. On
one occasion I went to Mrs. Sinnett's rather earlier than
usual. There was only a sprinkling of people present,
and I was sitting on a sort of wide ottoman, with some
one else dos a dos. At the moment I was not talking to
anyone, but Mr. Sinnett was holding an animated
conversation with the person behind me. Naturally I
could hear nearly all he said, but not much of the
replies made. He was speaking, with evident feeling,
about the futility of H. P. B. having come to London
and started another Lodge.
I should mention at this point that, when the Blavatsky
Lodge was formed, he issued an ingeniously worded
notice to the members of his " London " Lodge, to the
effect that any who wished to join the new Lodge could
leave his! Quite half the members, including myself,
promptly left. How could we hesitate for a moment
between H. P. B. and Mr. Sinnett ? The idea was
grotesque, and only a man completely blinded by his
own colossal egotism could ever have failed to see it. I
can remember well, on the afternoon in question, that
such palpably obvious jealousy of H. P. B. astonished
me very much ; also it seemed to me not a little ill-bred
and indiscreet to exhibit it so publicly. It was my first
lesson in the extraordinary pettiness and
narrow-mindedness of many of those who in early days
received exceptional and priceless privileges at H. P.
B.'s hands.
After I left the " At Home," I went on to Lansdowne
Road to return a book the Countess had lent me,
allowing myself time to catch the train for Harrow. H. P.
B. was then working practically from 6 to 6, with breaks
only for meals. I thought myself safe, as it was only
5.30. Not at all; as I was passing through the hall
on my way up to the Countess's room, I heard H. P. B.'s
voice (the door was slightly ajar) : " Is that you, Alice,
my dear ? " Hardly waiting for any reply, she
continued : " Come in, come in." Now I had
been wondering on my way from the Sinnett's exactly
what might happen if H. P. B. "sensed" where I had
been. So I was not at all surprised when she turned
round from her desk and, in her most winning manner,
said : " And where have you been, my dear ? " Then I
immediately realised that the fat was indeed in the
fire ! " To Mrs. Sinnett's At Home, H. P. B." I
replied. " Ah! and whom did you see there ? . . . "
proceeding to put me through a long inquisitorial
process. Had I spoken to Mr. Sinnett ?—"Ah I
And what did he say ? " etc. My replies became
more and more larne and confused; but finally, when
she actually asked me. if her name had, been
mentioned, I plucked up courage. Here at least
I was sure of niy ground, and, my worldly training
coming to my aid, I boldly said " Yes," but that it
was all too confused for me to be able to recollect
clearly what had been said, and other similar
ambiguities. At this she feigned to be quite; angry,
and dismissed me with " Well, if you won't tell me, I
shall look in the Astral Light and find out for myself ! "
I well knew what she would discover there, and that
she would " see " the replies to Mr. Sinnett's remarks
which I had failed to catch. I rushed up to the
Countess and told her what H. P. B. had said, but,
being in a hurry to catch my train, I did not tell her
what I had overheard at the Sinnett's " At Home."
The Countess had only cold comfort to offer me, for
she declared that H. P. B. would certainly "look," if
she had said so. And we both knew, too, of her
power to do what she threatened.
The sequel was somewhat startling. I went up as usual
on Thursday for our Lodge meeting in good time, for I
was all agog to find out if anything had happened, or if
H. P. B. had dismissed the whole thing from her mind.
Again, on my way upstairs, she called me in, and
announced triumphantly that she had looked in the
Astral Light, as she said she would ; and she forthwith "
read " it all off to me, not only what I had heard, but
with all the gaps filled in as well. The Countess had a
very serious face, when I went on up to her room, and
said : " Yes," H. P. B. had written down the whole thing
that same evening (Tuesday), and had sent it off at
once by a messenger to the Sinnetts. Early on
Wednesday morning they had both come round and
enquired of the maid who answered the door whether I
had been there the previous afternoon. Hearing that I
had, they went off immediately, without seeing, or
asking to see, anyone. That settled it, in their minds: I
had of course been round and " reported " (like a
veritable spy) all I had heard. So, at least, it must have
appeared to them ; and from that day they practically
struck me off the list of their acquaintances, without
even giving me the opportunity of explaining.
The worst part of it all, to me, was the discovery that
neither of them really believed (a) in the Astral Light
and its properties ; or (b) in H. P. B.'s power to " read "
in it. Or, if they believed the former, they clearly
doubted the latter. It was a great shock; for rather, so it
seemed to me, did they prefer to think I had
intentionally made mischief, proving that they credited
me with bad breeding and ingratitude—if no worse.
The whole incident was in itself a severe blow to my
belief in human nature and in the value of friendship.
But I needed the lesson, for at that time I was far too
credulous and trustful, in an unintelligent and
undiscriminating way ; particularly where people who
had been kind to me were concerned. But, as the
Master K. H. wrote to a correspondent (Miss F.
Arundale, then Hon. Secretary and Treasurer of the
London Lodge) in the early eighties :—" Learn then to
look at men below the surface, and to neither condemn
nor trust on appearances." (Letters from the Masters of
Wisdom, No. xx, p. 62.) This I had at least to try and
learn, even if I could not actually succeed in doing so.
That splendid impersonality which was, to a
pre-eminent degree, H. P. B.'s, is a quality of the Soul
and hard to attain by lesser beings (for women, indeed,
almost impossible !) inhabiting a world where—as she
wrote of the West—"Men think that their own likes and
dislikes of other men and things are guiding principles
for them to act upon, even when they do not make of
them the law of their lives and seek to impose them
upon others." (Practical Occultism, p. 19).
Others have written at such length, and with such a
wealth of detail, of the marvels they saw H. P. B.
perform that, even had I anything new to relate on these
lines (which I have not), merely to chronicle such "
signs and wonders " is, as I see it, somewhat barren of
good and lasting results. H. P. B. did not come to
dazzle our senses with such " feats." She came to show
us ourselves ; our weaknesses, perhaps. Yes, but above
and beyond all else, to show us our inherent god-like
potentialities. And ever she insisted that the only path
thereto was the practice of Brotherhood, to " live the
life," which is— and has ever been—the sole condition for
becoming one with the " God within."
During this period, before the formation of the Esoteric
School and the publication of The Secret Doctrine, so
much was always happening, so much emerges from my
memory, so many, and such varied incidents,
that it is difficult to know what to select. Many of her
pupils have written of H. P. B.'s methods of dealing
with them ; for instance, Countess Wachtmeister writes
:— " I have no doubt now that the difficulties I
experienced in getting access to Madame Blavatsky,
and the delays that occurred before she came to the
point with me, were calculated, and were of the nature
of a probation, but I had no suspicion of this at the
time." Exactly my own case ; and I can here give
another characteristic instance of such dealings.
An index was of course required, and was being
prepared for The Secret Doctrine, for which many
helpers were needed. Naturally I volunteered, and was
given a number of page-proofs to deal with, as my
share. I was quite elated, and felt that now I was really
going to be of some use. I gave up hours a day to the
work, and declined many otherwise most desirable (at
that time they were so) engagements. For weeks I toiled
at this new and somewhat uncongenial task, imagining
I was acquitting myself quite creditably. I may have
been ; I never knew. A couple of days after I had sent
the MS. up to Lansdowne Road I was there myself. H.
P. B. called me into her room and, pointing to my not
inconsiderable pile of MS. which lay on her desk, she
flicked it contemptuously with her beautiful forefinger
saying " This is not in the least what I wanted, my dear;
it won't do at all." Thereupon she tore the sheets across
and flung them into the waste paper basket. I nearly
wept; but she took no further notice of me. Later I
discovered that Indexing is an art, and that I knew
nothing whatever about it. This little experience was,
however, extremely good for me at that early stage.
The Blavatsky Lodge meetings were generally kept up
till quite late in the evening, and had it not been
for H. P. B.'s personal kindness I should often have had
to leave early, in order not to miss the last train back to
Harrow. She made me stay the night many a time, and
sleep on the bed-sofa in her sitting-room (the inner
drawing-room), close to the door leading into her tiny
bedroom, and up against one of its walls. How often
did I try to remain awake all night, feeling convinced
that I should " see " much. But No, when midnight
approached sleep became imperative, and I always had
to succumb ; never could I keep myself awake after
midnight, and H. P. B. would never explain why;
though, later, she told us once that " Master goes His '
rounds' at midnight," which threw some light on the
reason of my enforced sleep at that hour. She was then
referring to the students of the newly-formed E.S., who
had practically pledged themselves to Him, and was
emphasising the necessity for all of us to be " in bed
and asleep before midnight." Another thing she once
said, I remember, was that one hour's sleep before
midnight was worth four after it; owing to some
magnetic dumge which takes place in the earth as
midnight sweeps round its surface.
CHAPTER III.
Formation of the Esoteric School.
PASSING on to the time when the " Esoteric School of
Theosophy " was formed in the autumn of 1888, I find
the name of Mrs. Chowne immediately coming into my
mind ; for she was intimately bound up with the
circumstances and events attending my admission into
that body. She and her husband, Colonel Chowne,
were personal friends of H. P. B., who had stayed with
them in India, where he was stationed when she was
there (from '79 to '85) ; and she had no more loyal or
staunch adherents and supporters. I had met Mrs.
Chowne when I first joined the T. S., and we became
friends immediately. Indeed, I stayed with them more
than once in their London house after Colonel Chowne
had retired from the service.
In Lucifer for October, 1888, a notice had appeared to
the effect that an " Esoteric Section of the Theosophical
Society" was to be formed under H. P. B., and that
those who wished to join and abide by its Rules should
send in their names. Mrs. Chowne and I, also Colonel
Chowne, if I remember rightly, at once responded ; but
for some time we heard nothing. Then, one day, Mrs.
Chowne came down to Harrow to see me—I was ill at the
time—bringing the E. S. T. Pledge from H. P. B. for me to
write out and sign. She said that H. P. B. had told her
that, on our sending in our signed Pledges, each one
would be " tested " (i.e., " examined for fitness ") on
inner planes, by the Master. Mrs. Chowne's exact words
were, " taken out and tested. " Our past lives would be
called up, and upon what was there seen and known of
our real selves, would depend whether or not we were
accepted as candidates. She told me later that when she
handed our signed Pledges to H. P. B. she had looked
very seriously—almost solemnly—at her, and said :— " It is a
great trust that you have given me."
So we waited ; days, even weeks passed, and nothing
occurred. I had almost forgotten what Mrs. Chowne had
warned me might happen, until, one Tuesday night, (it
was Full Moon, I remember) I had the most wonderful
experience, save one, that had ever happened to me. I
knew I was myself, lying half awake, half asleep, in my
own room at home. Yet I was also in an Egyptian
Temple of extraordinary grandeur, and going through
things quite unspeakable and most solemn. This
experience began soon after 10 P.M., and almost exactly
as a neighbouring church clock struck midnight I lost
consciousness in an overpowering and almost terrible
blaze of light, which seemed completely to envelope
me. The next morning I recorded all I could remember
in my diary, and on Thursday went up to Lansdowne
Road as usual for the Lodge meeting. I was a little early,
but H. P. B. at work in the inner room must have
known who had arrived, for she called me in, and
turning round, said most seriously : " Master told me
last night that you are accepted." Nothing more; but I at
once realised vividly that my experience the previous
Tuesday night had indeed been my " testing."
Thereupon I related the whole thing to H. P. B., who
only nodded several times, but made no remark
whatever about it.
Mrs. Chowne told me afterwards that she and her
husband had had similar experiences, adding that only
a few of the first applicants were so " tested "; that it
did not, in fact, apply generally. Certainly I never heard
from anyone else that they had been told what Mrs.
Chowne told me. Members of the E. S. T. were all
known by numbers (the uneven ones), and the
Chownes and myself, and two others, since dead (as is
Colonel Chowne also), received the first five single
numbers. It may or may not have been a " coincidence,"
but it is a curious fact that the school numbers of both
my boys (one of whom died comparatively young) were
multiples of the number H. P. B. herself gave me when
she wrote out and handed me my E. S. certificate.
One of the clauses of the original E. S. T. Pledge ran
thus:—"I pledge myself to support before the world the
Theosophical Movement, its leaders and its members
....." Not long after the School was formed, I made one
of a number of the House inmates and workers at
Lansdowne Road who were gathered together one
evening in the den of the Secretary (then Mr. Bertram
Keightley) upstairs; there may have been six or eight of
us. It was late (I was staying the night) and we were
discussing an attack on H. P. B. in the Westminster
Gazette, an evening paper, which had just come in. [It
was this paper which in 1894 published the elaborate
attack based on information furnished by Mr. W. R.
Old (a member of the Inner Group) against Mr. Judge
and his methods, which led to the disruption of the T.
S. a year later.] Suddenly H. P. B.'s bell rang somewhat
violently, and Mr. Keightley jumped up with some
semi-jocular remark and ran downstairs to her room. I
must confess that it had not occurred to any of us even
to suggest replying to this attack, which, so far as I
remember, was a scurrilous one. While Mr. Keightley
was downstairs we just went on with our desultory talk;
after a few minutes he returned with a very long face
and serious manner. He said we were under severe
reproof by the Master, who (unseen, of course) had
been in the room while we were so light-heartedly
discussing the newspaper attack on our " Outer Head."
He had descended immediately to H. P. B. in great
displeasure, telling her to inform us that if this was our
conception of keeping our newly-taken pledge we had
better all resign at once. We—at least I can speak for
myself—were terribly ashamed, and all with one accord
sat down at once and wrote as good a defence and
indignant protest as in us lay. I do not remember the
sequel, but certainly one, if not more, of those letters
were inserted.
This incident was the seed of what later became the
Press Bureau, formed for the express purpose of keeping
track of such attacks and criticisms on H. P. B. and the
work generally, and of seeing that they were promptly
and suitably dealt with. It became a most successful
institution, and the various Press Cutting Agencies
provided ample material and saved an enormous
amount of search work. Mrs. Cooper-Oakley was in
charge of the bureau, and sent out the cuttings to
members most able to deal with them. I was one of the
staff of writers ; and later, under Mr. Judge, I had entire
charge of the European Press Bureau. During this work
I made a valuable collection of cuttings, including all
the obituary notices of H. P. B.
Many a proof did I have- of H. P. B.'s power of "
hearing " and " seeing " at a distance ; things mostly too
personal to relate and usually connected with reproof or
instruction. Countess Wachtmeister bears witness in
her Reminiscences to these same powers in H. P. B.
One day, not very long before she moved away from
Lansdowne Road, Mr. George Mead and I were with
her in her little sanctum (the inner drawing-room). The
Voice of the Silence—one of the most wonderful mystical
works of this or any other time—had just been published,
and she was looking at one of the first copies. Suddenly
handing it to us (it may have been one each ; I do not
remember) she said something to the effect of How did
we like it ? or, What did we think of it ? I forget the
exact words. She was her most serious self. I opened the
little book, haphazard, and read one or two verses, and
the tears started involuntarily to my eyes, such was the
beauty and pathos of the words I had read. I looked up
at H. P. B., and was almost certain I saw the glimmer of
a tear in hers ; but she abruptly changed the subject,
and jumped down my throat about something or other.
As I see it now, it was because to allow mere
sentimental emotionalism to become linked with a
theme too solemn and too deep for tears was dangerous.
Too dangerous, I mean, for us Western people, with our
" sensuous development of brain and nerves " (as she
once wrote) ; and unworthy of the exalted nature of the
subject-matter dealt with in the book. But I shall
always believe I did see tears in her eyes at that
moment—always.
Almost the last—in fact it was the very last— incident I
recollect of the Lansdowne Road days is, to me, the
most touching and tragic of all my memories of H. P. B.
It was the day before she left for 19, Avenue Road,
Regent's Park, N.W., and as it was a lovely warm
afternoon the Countess had taken her for a drive in
Hyde Park, in the fashionable hour. Never shall I forget
her return from that drive ; Mrs. Cooper-Oakley and I
were in the double drawing-room when she entered,
followed by the Countess, in what seemed to be almost
a passion ; but it was a passion of grief. She walked up
and down the room, the tears streaming down her face,
ejaculating from time to time :—" Not a Soul among
them—not one! " It was a heart-cry of grief, a poignant
illustration—and my first sight—of that " helpless pity for
the men of Karmic sorrow " (of which I had only just
read in The Voice of the Silence) felt by those Great
Ones who through countless lives have worked for the
redemption of humanity.
A trained Occultist, like H. P. B., can see more and far
deeper than the mere semi-material aura visible to most
clairvoyants, with its ever-changing colours and
thought-images. Such an one sees whether the aura
reveals the presence of a Soul. This is seen and known,
also by colour—or vibration—but vibration on a far higher
plane of consciousness than those reachable by
ordinary psychic vision. We commonly take for
granted that each person must " have " a soul. Yet our
Teachers tell us in unmistakable terms that such is not
the case. " We elbow soulless men and women at
every step in life," writes H. P. B. in Isis Unveiled (II, p.
369) ; and her Master tells us that " He who defendetk
not the persecuted and the helpless, who giveth not of
his food to the starving, nor draweth water from his well
for the thirsty, hath been born too soon in human
shape." This is clear beyond a shadow of
misunderstanding, and explains the nature of the grief
felt by H. P. B.--grief called forth by pity and
compassion for those helpless, soulless beings, " born
too soon in human shape," whom she had that
afternoon seen in their hundreds, in Hyde Park. It
was something entirely above and beyond my
comprehension; but it was divine--if ever anything
was. It was Buddha-like.
BY THE SAME AUTHOR. UNIFORM WITH THIS
VOLUME.
H. P. Blavatsky : Her Life and Work for Humanity.
A Vindication, and an Exposition of her Mission and
Teachings. The main tenets of The Secret Doctrine are
clearly summarized, the legal unsoundness of the
charges formulated by the Society for Psychical
Research in 1885 is conclusively demonstrated, and
many new and important facts are given concerning the
Theosophical Movement.
" It is a wonderful record, and I, who have had the
priceless privilege of knowing most of those who were
in touch with H. P. B., and are still alive, can find few
words to express my gratitude for the book. It is written
with the blood of the heart; it is aflame with the high
inspiration that was aroused by the Teacher in the
pupil's heart, and which has never grown less in the
years and the disappointments that have followed the
Teacher's passing ... I shall love and prize this volume
because it has made me new-hearted in my defence of
H. P. B."--Mr. John M. Prentice, in Dawn.
" This book, like Mrs. Cleather's talks, illuminates, and
is illuminated by H. P. B., who becomes more than ever
a "vision splendid," and the chapter which summerizes
the leading conceptions of The Secret Doctrine can
only be regarded by students as one of the finest things
in our Theosophical literature."--From an Editorial
account of Mrs. Cleather's visit to Australia, in Dawn,
March, 1923.
H. P. Blavatsky: A Great Betrayal. A Protest against
the policy of the Theosophical Society, as developed
since H. P. Blavatsky's death in 1891, giving important
inside information based on Mrs. Cleather's personal
knowledge and experience as a pupil of H. P. B. since
1887, and original documents in her possession. An
exposure of the methods and doctrines of so-called "
Neo-Theosophy."
" It is to be hoped that every member of the T. S.
throughout the world will read Mrs. Cleather's two
books. The Great Betrayal is for the day only ; it is a
reformer's manual as much as anything, and on fighting
lines. H. P. B.--Her Life and, Work for Humanity,
will take its place as a classic . . . Mrs. Cleather has
promised to write some introductory books on
Theosophical subjects, and it is safe to say that these
will be of great value in the future."--Dawn.
" A notable publication ... It purports to show that the
present leaders of the ' Theosophical Society ' have
departed more and more from H. P. Blavatsky's
teachings, and that they are ' now their direct antithesis,
particularly on the fundamental question of sex
morality.' ... It will assuredly create a sensation in
theosophical circles. . . A note of sincerity--almost
passionate sincerity--seems to ring through it from cover
to cover. Assuredly no Theosophist can afford to
neglect its perusal, which has keenly interested us,
though a layman where Theosophism is
concerned."--Bangalore Post.
CALCUTTA and SIMLA : THACKER, SPINK &
CO. LONDON : W. THACKER & Co., 2, CREED
LANE, E.C.4, 1923.>>
========snip
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application