Theos-Talk Archives (April 2003 Message tt00140)

For scientific minded theosophists (or scientifically religious philosophers 
:-)

Here's an interesting modern view of Cosmogenesis that tries to explain in 
simple analogies how the universe originates and evolves -- which is 
supposedly consistent with modern science, including relativity, quantum and 
Superstring/M(em)brane theories. 

http://www.treeincarnation.com/

These ideas generally mesh with the ABC theory -- which uses a model (also 
consistent with modern physics theories) that starts from the zero-point of 
absolute (abstract) space-motion, and -- beginning with a fundamental non 
polar neutrality (circular spin in opposite directions) -- upon initial 
emanation, becomes polarized (spirally and spherically, like twin bubbles 
within a surrounding bubble) and, thus, forms a dual, left-right symmetry and 
up-down, back-front asymmetry. 
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif. 
(See this as the symbolic cross section of a spherical universe that expands 
from a central primal zero-point-instant and fractally involves downward 
along a vertical line of zero-point centers.)

However, this alternative "tree" theory avoids the zero-point altogether, and 
begins with two "membranes" of opposite polarity for which there is no 
reality... Since, they cannot be directly related to the fundamental 
circular motion of primal force that, to maintain symmetry and conservation 
of energy, must emanate spirally (and repetitively in triple cycles) out from 
(and back to) each zero-point of Absolute Space... (Although, much of the 
conclusions of this model, do relate to this fundamental cyclicality of 
primal force that eventually becomes spherical fields of mass/energy in our 
space-time continuum.) 

To see how the "dark" matter fields relate to the "light" matter fields, and 
emanate back to back from the same primal zero-point-instant spinergy or 
"Cosmic singularity," go to:
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
(Fold the diagram along the horizontal center line to visualize how these two 
aspects of fundamental matter can be coadunate, or interpenetrate each other, 
and exist in the same place, while they involve, step down and increase in 
physical energy and density and decrease in frequency and spiritual energy -- 
as the spherical fields get smaller and smaller and approach the bottom lines 
of solid matter.)

This spherical involution is the basis of all cyclic phenomena and of the 
harmonic electrical laws that govern the transfer of holographic information 
from one coenergetic field to another (that must be "coadunate but not 
consubstantial," as explained by theosophical metaphysics) and that relates 
to and links consciousness with matter -- as two opposite aspects of a 
fundamental unity... One (consciousness or spirit) "empty" of form, and the 
other (matter or mass/energy) "full" of forms that follow the basic 
symmetries and asymmetries of the "primal beginning" (or involved fractal, 
triune monadic fields)... "As above, so below," as Hermes Trismagistus 
pointed out long before Western science realized that "spin" is the 
fundamental basis of all motion, mass and energy. 

The problem, with respect to the above "tree incarnation" model, is trying to 
explain the complexity of nonlinear fractal, spherical hyperspace fields 
within fields within fields, etc., that are integrally, holographically and 
coenergetically connected -- by starting cosmic cyclic evolution with 
separate linear planes or membranes that have no logical origin... Rather 
than, as ABC (and theosophical metaphysics) does -- beginning with the 
fundamental unified simplicity of a spinning spherical point of infinite 
potential coenergetics -- which relates directly to the infinitely complex 
potentialities of physical forms that maintain a fundamental left-right 
symmetry, along with up-down, and back-front asymmetry. Thus, such forms as 
the human body, are conditioned directly by that symmetry and asymmetry. As 
is our physical consciousness which sees and considers only what is right in 
front of us, or under our feet.

This aspect of material nature has a fundamental relationship with the 
fractal involution of the primal fields and their progressive three, five, 
and seven fold spherical nature prior the breaking of symmetry. Due to what 
science calls unexplained random "quantum fluctuations." But which, from a 
theosophical standpoint, is more likely due, early on, to the interference's 
caused by the opposing free will choices of individually separated primal 
awareness related to particular involved monadic fields of consciousness -- 
i.e., separate "beings" with differing viewpoints of a triune 3-dimensional 
spherical reality that is common to all of them.

That reality is only symmetrical in one dimension due to the nature of 
nonlinear fractal involution along a linear time line (or string of 
zero-point instants). Such involution is followed by morphogenetic 
evolutionary processes that can be modified by random mutations, random 
environmental changes, consciously directed (yet conflicting) will, and 
survival of the fittest. In a deeper sense, there is no such thing as 
"random"... Since, all actions are based on causative factors --e.g., what 
appears to be chaotic has within it a fundamental order (e.g., the smeared 
out ink drop in a spinning column of water that, when spin is reversed, is 
restored to its original shape). 

In addition, this "tree" model completely avoids the question of explaining 
consciousness, or its aspect of awareness and will -- which the ABC theory 
postulates are fundamental qualities of the stationary zero-point, itself... 
That is outside of all metric space and time, yet integrally linked to them 
by direct lines of spin energy (spinergy) which forms descending fractal 
triadic (Monadic) and coenergetic polarized fields of consciousness that 
surround each reflected neutral zero-point... Of which there can be an 
infinite number (being dimensionless)... As, each finite universe emanates 
and expands from the primal zero-point of infinite potential energy -- 
represented by infinite abstract "spin," or angular momentum, that can exist 
in non dimensional and non frictional primal or Absolute space without any 
prior cause. (But, then, if the zero-point-instant is the infinite 
consciousness of Parabrahm, or unconditioned pre-cosmic reality, why wouldn't 
its curiosity force it to look around in every direction to see where it is 
and what surrounds it? :-) Thus, we might consider that the "absolute" is 
relative and the "relative" is absolute.

Also, the "tree" model fails to explain how that ABC emanational expansion 
into spherical fields within fields within fields (the surfaces of which are 
in effect, "Membranes") relates to the chakras of the human body and its 
seven fold hyperspace nature, as well as to the similar potential nature of 
all apparently separate beings -- extending from the simplest quantum 
particles to the most complex vegetable, animal, and human beings. (To one 
who is "awake" to one's inner nature, such relationships are as simple as 
a-b-c. :-)

To compare these two views of Cosmogenesis, see:

http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/evolution2.html

Hope you enjoy thinking about all this, and seeing how it fits in with 
theosophical metaphysics as explained thoroughly in the Secret Doctrine.:-)

LHM