Theos-Talk Archives (April 2003 Message tt00139)

Some gossip on this forum said that a scientist on another forum has torn my 
theory of ABC (which relates the metaphysics taught by HPB with the leading 
edges of modern metaphysical science) into shreds. 

That may be true (when observed superficially) -- but the so-called 
"scientist" that did so (with specious arguments) was not a physicist at all 
but a cognitive psychologist on a forum that is full of many died-in-the-wool 
materialists who assume that consciousness is an epiphenomena of the brain's 
complex neurology... A theory, like many other reductive scientific theories 
of matter and space, that has no valid scientific basis whatsoever... 
Especially, when it comes to understanding the roots of consciousness and its 
relationship to matter and the holographic mechanism of perceptive 
consciousness. (See, my previous letters on the subject in the archives of 
the jcs-online, mind-brain, bn-study and theos talk online e-mail forums. and 
at...) 
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/einstein.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/yinyang.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/evolution2.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif 

In addition, most of these so called cognitive "scientists," who are frozen 
in their dualistic and materialistic beliefs, cannot accept the 
mathematically consistent and synthetic (merging relativity with quantum 
physics) postmodern theories of Superstring/M-branes -- that indicates 
space-time, consciousness and matter is multidimensional, with at least a 10 
fold hyperspace configuration -- much like the teachings of theosophy as well 
as the fractal geometry models (spherical coadunate but not consubstantial 
fields) postulated and diagrammed by the ABC theory -- that sees reality (the 
fundamental monad) as a trinity, rather than a duality. 

Many of these "scientists" are in the same boat, with relation to the new 
scientific metaphysics of "space-time-consciousness-matter," as the classical 
(Newtonian) physicists were when Einstein introduced his relativity and 
quantum theories of "space-time-matter" and the equation E=mc^2 (that, 
incidentally, was presaged by HPB in the Secret Doctrine) -- which did not 
consider consciousness other than as the "observer" rather than the "creator" 
of reality. In spite of this ignorance, leading edge science is gradually 
approaching the idea of a multidimensional universe created by consciousness 
out of its own force or substance (ref; The "spinergy" of the zero 
point-instant, and the essential interconnectivity of all its emanated 
hyperspace and metric space fields)... And, it won't be long before they find 
the proof that the theosophical metaphysical model of the universe was right 
all along -- as HPB predicted they would in the early part of this century 
(through the accumulation of their own irrefutable observations).

Below is a link to a paper recommended by the editor of the Journal of 
Consciousness Study that shows how close the concepts of theosophical 
metaphysics, and the theory of ABC (that explains it in modern scientific 
terms) is to explaining the true nature of reality that science is now 
beginning to almost understand. (However, they won't be all there until they 
prove that the mind and consciousness can exist independent of the body.) 

http://www.imprint.co.uk/pdf/smythies.pdf

So much for gossips and sneerers who discredit the theosophical metaphysics 
and their importance in the understanding of consciousness and its 
relationship to both subjective and objective matter and energy.

Leon Maurer