Theos-Talk Archives (March 2003 Message tt00385)

Hi Leon,
Some comments below. 
> Leon:
> We can only speak of the Cosmos (Brahma), which can be 
unconditioned (when 
> asleep) and conditioned (when awake). The Absolute reality, 
rootless root, 
> (Parabrahm) or Krishna, is neither conditioned nor unconditioned, 
but always 
> is Absolute and ineffable. Yet, while they are all part of the one 
reality, 
> they are different in their state or circumstance of existence. 
Remember, 
> The Absolute is the Father of innumerable universes, and no matter 
how many 
> of them are either in conditioned or unconditioned states of 
existence, 
> Parabrahm or Ein Soph is forever unchanged. Admittedly, that cannot 
be 
> "sensed" since it is beyond all finite conception. However, the 
unconditioned 
> Cosmos (Brahma) can only be "sensed" by the "open eye of the Dagma" 
when it 
> manifests or becomes conditioned. (Ref: Stanzas I-II)

> So, if you are interested in visualizing these relationships, I 
> suggest you study the diagrams at:
> http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
> http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
I like these two pictures. The first seems to me more consistent with 
the fractal idea. To make the latter cosistent every circle would 
need to be filled with more circles - which would take all the beauty 
out of it. (the mathematician in me speaking). 
Can you give a link to the page where you explain those diagrams?

Do you agree with Steve's interpretation of your work that the 
different universes are in fact only our individual interpretations 
of these universes? 

Katinka