Theos-Talk Archives (March 2003 Message tt00111)

Hi. The material below is lunatic. I"m sure everyone already realizes this,
but maybe somehow, just for the record, it needs to be verbalized. Most
people, however mixed-up they may be, are connected to reality in a way that
this human being is not. Somehow theosophy does seem to attract a lot of
people such as this, doesn't it? That should not be happening to the extent
it does. There are major flaws and there is no way to avoid facing this and
still preserve your integrity. It is best not to be ignored but addressed.

Be realistic. You are probably not a group of people who are going to
stimulate the formation of a universal brotherhood. My guess is there are
quite a number of people like this in many of the lodges. If you read this
material below and contrast it with certain bland, over idealistic and
obscenely overly prolific material that is once more starting to be all over
these boards like a cheap suit saturated with the perfume of a snake oil
salesman, you can see that one leads to and supports the other and
visa-versa.

I know you mean well Netemara, but that is not enough. You need to do
something physical like take a walk around the block. Just the physical body
walking around the block and something with no opinion recording it as an
object. Actually, this would not be a good exercise for you to do, but I
leave these words above, as maybe it will be good for someone else. If you
need to keep leaving such messages out here, it is o.k. with me. I should
not have criticized you so harshly. You are just trying to share, but do not
worry about Hitler of the Jews. It is just a bunch of thoughts. A mermber of
the what you call "The White Lodge" would not need to analyze material in
the way you are doing. It is not real Work, just a form of mechanical
seething. I will be praying for you that you are able to feel your sorrow
consciously for thirty seconds a day, perhaps early in the morning when the
dew is still fresh on the grass. It is not necessary to reply to this
message. Sincerely, Wry

----- Original Message -----
From: "netemara888" <netemara888@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World The reincafnation of "WC" Leadbeater


What this has to do with Theosophy I really don't know. I
> think Zionists and Jews find delight in that the whole world is not
> crying over their Holocaust and Hitler. I for one am not.
>
> Hitler was a Catholic monk under Bernard of Clairvaux in France (I
> have posted more details about this at theosophy_talks_truth from my
> manuscript draft). This Bernard was later to become William Judge of
> Theosophy. St. Bernard had to constantly check Adolf in that life as
> he was continually leaving the monastery to participate in pograms
> against Jews during the Middle Ages in France and Europe. They did
> not condone it but could not change his strong feelings on the
> subject. Yes, there is a definite tie between Hitler and Theosophy.
> The thing is a person can have many children, but if one becomes a
> Zodiac Killer and the rest of the family is normal then are the
> parents the ones who raised this child to be a serial killer? I don't
> think so.
>
> The same with Hitler. He strayed from Theosophy. We had to disown him
> completely. We were not in Germany and did not participate in the
> Holocaust. In fact WE (The White Lodge) abandoned Hitler. This opened
> the door to other forces, which crept in and gained power over him
> and gave him power as well. That is partly why the horrors were SO
> horrible. Then the world had to be saved from this. Hitler was used
> by the Black Lodge. He did not use the ideals of Theosophy. He may
> have used some symbols but HPB says many times there is NOTHING new
> and those symbols DO NOT belong to Theosophy, any more than the word
> Theosophy belongs to Blavatsky.
>
> He has returned and will have to pay for this in subsequent lives
> just like anyone else.
>
> Netemara
>
> PS I'm glad you're not a Theosophist either.
>
>
>
> Blavatsky was a profoundly
> > >antisocial character whose chief joy in life, asiee from drug
> abuse
> > >and overeating was abusing and manipulating people. Her ownb
> > >admirers admit that and have documented it profusely. There is no
> > >question Hitler felt enough sympatico with "theosophists" to
> > >appropriate their symbol for his own movement. After all,
> Theosophy
> > >is defined by the kind of people who profess it. Thank goodness I
> am
> > >not a Theosophist.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>