Theos-Talk Archives (February 2003 Message tt00237)

I've now read BAG's article which can be found at:

Secrets of Theosophical Thought Systems P4
http://www.raphaelvishanu-world.at/thoughtsystems4.html

BAG apparently feels the need to devote his energies to producing an 
ad hominem argument against me instead of dealing in a scholarly 
fashion with the issues I brought up. And his remaining remarks 
about the issues are so general and so vague that one is left 
wondering what he is exactly referring to.

What scholarly publication would publish such ad hominem remarks?

Compare what BAG wrote about me with what he wrote to and about Jerry 
Schueler:

"Is BAG employing an 'Ad Hominem' Argument?"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10842

See also the following sources for the philosophical & 
metaphysical issues, points and arguments brought up by the Mahatmas 
on "God", "spirit", "matter", "atman", Parabrahm, etc. These issues 
and arguments were never directly addressed by BAG.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10844

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10845

Also BAG never directly addressed the following issues on the 
Mahatmas and their letters:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10794

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10796 

What motivates an individual to avoid the relevant issues and instead 
launch an ad hominem argument?

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc