Theos-Talk Archives (February 2003 Message tt00216)

Hi,

THinking of Parabrahman acting are two concepts that don't unite in 
my mind, which is why I talked about "any god", instead of your word: 
Parabrahman. Parabrahman is the All, isn't it, the fundamental root 
of everything, allencompassing etc. It acts only in that there is 
action in it - at least, that is how my mind can only see it. To ask 
for its inspiration in action, seems like a contradiction in terms. 
to me.

Katinka
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:
> 
> Hi Katinka and all of you,
> 
> Thanks for your email. Maybe the below can be of some help to 
someone...
> My views are:
> 
> You wrote:
> "I don't believe that any action can be beyond karma."
> 
> My answer:
> Yes, agreed. But God - ParaBrahman is not really 'acting' in any 
litteral or
> narrowminded sense of this word. God - ParaBrahman is beyond your 
very
> thoughts !
> 
> 
> You wrote:
> "The actor can
> > avoid being attached to the result, but that is as far as I think 
one
> > can avoid responsibility."
> 
> My answer:
> Yes and No.
> No - because NO actor, (the word 'actor' taken in a litteral 
sense), can
> avoid Karma, - good or bad.
> Yes - because we can act (and transcend the use of acting) 
unselfish and be
> unattached to (what we call) OUR actions. (We can transcend the use 
of
> acting or being beyond our own level of thinking...)
> Yes - Being unattached to the result is allright.
> But - Being unattached to acting or being (sort of litterally 
speaking) is
> even better.
> 
> You wrote:
> "The same goes for any God. "
> My answer:
> NO ! Not for any God - ParaBrahman.
> God - ParaBrahman do NOT act - and is not an actor ! >:-)
> Please do not degrade God - ParaBrahman...
> (...aehm...maybe I am even doing that by writing this email...)
> Please rethink your view...I urge you.
> 
> from
> M. Sufilight with peace and love...