Stodgy Theology & the Heresy of Separativeness
Jan 18, 2003 01:08 PM
by Phillip Lindsay " <phillip@esotericastrologer.org>
>From the BA G interview:
TS Leader: "If we say she [HPB] invented the Mahatmas, then, of
course, as so often was said by her, all that she has taught and
written is the product of her own brain, from which we would be
bound to conclude that her position on the roll of great and
powerful persons must be higher than people have been willing to
place her."
Interesting quote, I could not help but wonder that if the `she' in
the above quote was substituted for AAB, it bears much similarity to
the fact that AAB could not have been personally capable
of `dreaming up' what she wrote from DK.
>From reading that interview one is left with the dry taste of STODGY
THEOLOGY. Theological theosophy, or theosophical theology. Lineages,
doctrines, what is `acceptable' to use.
With this interview and much that I have encountered on this forum,
there has not been much discussion of the kernel, core, essence of
any teachings.
I identify the `heresy of separativeness' as the main problem here:
"The light of his soul will reveal to the *earnest aspirant* the
unity underlying all groups, and enable him to eliminate the poison
of intolerance which taints and hinders so many; it will cause him
to recognise the spiritual fundamentals which guide the steps of
humanity; it will force him to overlook the intolerance and the
fanaticism and separativeness which characterise the *small mind and
the beginner upon the Path*, and help him so to love them that they
will begin to see more truly and enlarge their horizon"
(Externalisation of the Hierarchy, p.20)
"Separativeness… is the isolated attitude and which makes the mind
the barrier to right group relations."
"If you were to ask me what, in reality, lies behind all disease,
all frustrations, error and lack of divine expression in the three
worlds, I would say it was separativeness which produces the major
difficulties arising in the etheric body, plus the inability of the
outer tangible form to respond adequately to the inner and subtler
impulses." (Esoteric Healing p.82)
The greatest irony is that this forum allows an ongoing sleight of
Alice Bailey's teachings, whilst at the same time claim to be
protecting the HPB `lineage'.
The AAB/HPB schism has been perpetrated and compounded since the
days of those individuals. You may as well argue about whether
members are Catholic or Protestant, it's the same dichotomy that has
been created.
P.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application