Re: Phillip, what are your CRITERIA or STANDARDS?
Jan 13, 2003 02:20 PM
by Phillip Lindsay " <email@example.com>
Inner resonance and intuition! You know, that quality which renders
the separative concrete mind redundant. Intuition may have its flaws
working through the relatively unredeemed form, but it is more
reliable than the form of lower mind per se.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "D. H. Caldwell <info@b...>"
> Phillip, what are your CRITERIA or STANDARDS?
> Phillip, I asked you:
> "Do you believe that there really are 'charlatanesque imitations
> Occultism and Theosophy. . . .' "?
> You replied:
> "Loads of them! Clare Prophet and Summit Lighthouse,I Am Movement,
> and much other 'channelled' material. All make a travesty of the
> Masters and distort. Funny I have seen the likes of Faivre et al
> lump AAB in with them! Talk about ignorant prejudice!"
> Phillip, from what you write in the above statement it would
> that you have some kind of standard, some criteria. You have
> apparently compared Prophet and the Ballards against this standard
> and decided that their claims and teachings fall short and in fact
> represent "a travesty of the Masters and distort."
> In other words, it would appear that you have criteria by which
> can make a judgment that a certain teaching or claim (for example,
> Bailey's teaching/claim) is part of "genuine" Occultism and
> but another teaching or claim (by Prophet or Ballard) is
> a 'charlatanesque imitation of Occultism and Theosophy'."
> Can you tell us what your criteria are?
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application