FW: Fw: Lindsay quits
Jan 13, 2003 06:15 AM
by Eldon B Tucker
From: Phillip Lindsay <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Lindsay quits
actually I haven't quit - I messed up my online ID and am waiting
for membership approval...
--- In email@example.com, "Nick Weeks" <nick.weeks@w...>
> Below is the last note I rcvd privately from Philip Lindsay.
> My private response to him said I saw no reason to keep forwarding
> to Theos-talk, so I gave him the Theos-talk address so he could do
> I also said I would respond to the note below, privately or
publicly, as he
> wished. However that note of mine bounced and the Mailer Demon
said the Yahoo
> account had been closed down. So I guess preaching is PL's
> discussion with non-residents of the Baileywick.
> But he can have the last word -- written below.
> Fare Thee Well,
> From: <aabhpb@y...>
> To: "Nick Weeks" <nick.weeks@w...>
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 10:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Pseudo-theosophy of AAB & CWL
> > > Your second sentence must be rhetorical, since you continue
> > writing as if your
> > > assumption about pseudo-theosophy is correct. It is not.
> > theosophy is
> > > whatever teaching professes to be based on, and share the KEY
> > BASIC tenets
> > > of HPB & her Gurus, but does not. Therefore Crosbie, Wadia,
> > Tingley, Purucker
> > > for example, do share these keynotes of original Theosophy and
> > my mind are
> > > real Theosophists. Absolute fidelity to each and every
> > that HPB gave
> > > is not needed. But one must have a notion of which teachings
> > basic &
> > > vital and which are not.
> > So who decides or has decided what teaching does not'share the
> > or BASIC tenets of HPB & her Gurus' - what great authority, TS or
> > otherwise claimed it thus?
> > It seems a minority group within the TS (probably the ES) , who
> > an undue influence, deem it so.
> > >If your DK is same as HPB's DK why are his MAIN
> > >teachings opposed to the real Brothers teachings?
> > Again you make the assumption that you know who the 'real
> > teachings are. Your 'stuff and nonsense' remark is just a cheap
> > provocation and an insult to those very Brothers you claim to
> > recognise. It is you who have distorted BASIC theosophy by your
> > inability to plumb the new teachings and thereby retard its
> > But as with most fundamentalists, I can see dialogue is futile...
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application