Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00722)

The sex of the body is no more but a reflection of the solidified
impressions that a person have been accumulating and store in the
subconscious realm a life span. Usually a male person in one life span,
takes the form of a female in the next life span. Sometimes, a person takes
feminine forms throughout a longer duration of incarnations, let say, six in
a row. Then he takes a male form, hence the Law of duality comples the drop
soul - atma, to undergo all dual experiences while in Illusion. So, such a
person in a male form will feel as a female. So he might act as what being
called *homosexual*. And vise versa if a person took a long series of male
form. All this has nothing to do with spirituality, since the person must
take spiritual responsibility no matter what, and the limitations of shapes
and forms don't matter. They can form only challenges. I reallized, quite
clearly, that Madame Blavatsky accepted spiritual responsibility, and tried
to do her best, inspite of her many limitations. Her bodily sex had nothing
to do with this. Best wishes, Etzion
----- Original Message -----
From: <bhakti.eohn@verizon.net>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Alleged certificate re hermaphroditism TYPO
CORRECTED AND CLARIFICATION


> TYPO CORRECTED AT >> <<
>
> Now it is clear from photos of HPB that she did not experiance the
> kind of phyical masculinization that I did. Late virilizing forms of
> either XX or XY intersex are extremely rare. In these conditions, the
> child and adolesent may appear as a normal female. After a rather
> extreme >>(and possibly very late...in their 20s) 'puberty'<<, in
> which a
> phallus grows and secondary male sex characteristics develope, the
> person can no longer hide their transformation...or 'sex reversal'
> without great difficulty. This is obviously NOT what happened to
> HPB, but being feminine in her youth does not mean anything, as the
> late virilizing forms of intersex HOWEVER MILD OR EXTREME, do not
> NECESSARILY effect the person's pre- 'puberty' (pre-masculinizing)
> femininity.
>
> GENDER IDENTITY IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ROLES THAT PEOPLE LEARN TO PLAY
> FOR FAMILY AND SOCIAL APPROVAL. Even as a small child, I always knew
> I was a boy, and had started secretly calling myself David by the age
> of 9. At the age of 11 I introduced myself to my closest friend as
> David. At that time (and for years to come) I still showed no
> obvious external signs of being intersexed, that my family or others
> could detect. Still I was extremely neurologically fetally
> androgenized, even to the extent of 'knowing' I was 'really a boy'.
> So it is entirely possible that HPB had some late-virilizing form of
> intersex and a persistent sense of a masculine self, but developed a
> feminine familial and public persona for survival reasons.
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Bhakti Ananda Goswami
> <bhakti.eohn@v...>" <bhakti.eohn@v...> wrote:
> > Dear Paul,
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>