Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00048)

It has been contended by many students of H.P. Blavatsky that Alice 
A. Bailey's teachings are "pseudo-Theosophy."

See the following two essays:

(1) "Theosophy's Shadow: [A Critical Look at the Claims and 
Teachings of Alice A. Bailey]"
by Nicholas Weeks
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/baileyal.htm

(2) "The Pseudo-Occultism of Mrs. A. Bailey" 
by Alice Leighton Cleather and Basil Crump
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/HPBvsAB.html

For a differing point of view, see the following essays:

(3) "Alice A. Bailey, H.P. Blavatsky and Helena Roerich: Cleavages 
between the followers of three traditions: The Theosophical Society, 
The Arcane School, The Agni Yoga Society"
by Phillip Lindsay
http://www.esotericastrologer.org/AABHPBHR.htm

See especially:
"Refutation of Nicholas Weeks' article 'Theosophy's Shadow'" 
by Phillip Lindsay
http://www.esotericastrologer.org/AABHPBHR.htm#TSNW

(4) "H. P. Blavatsky versus Alice A. Bailey" 
by Morten Sufilight
http://home19.inet.tele.dk/global-theosophy/BLAVATSK.HTM

As one reads the above essays, one might also take into consideration 
what is written in an essay titled:

"Madame Blavatsky and the Latter-Day Messengers of the Masters"
compiled by Terry Hobbes 
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/contradictionslatermessengers.htm

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc