Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00665)

Hi Mr. Sufilight,

Everything you say is right on. And, I appreciate your candor.

As for the poetic and artistic aspects of ABC, I've also thought of that. 
Go to the following site and see for yourself:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/yinyang.html

For more ABC oriented art with a bit of meditative visualization thrown 
in, see:

http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/evolution2.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/manfields.html 
There is much more along these lines, but, to see them, you will have to 
visit me, or read my book (if I ever finish and publish it in print -- beyond 
what is already posted on the cyberworld web or in the Astral.:-) 
Incidentally, most ofthe letters I write to this and all the scientific 
forums 
are also part of my book.

Then go to the following site and find the links to some artistic pre ABC, 
"meditation with a seed" pencil paintings made about 25 years ago 
when I was wrapped up in -- but not trapped by -- the physical and astral 
worlds -- that need a bit of explanation -- before you get shocked by 
their candor. :-)
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/UAG.home.html

Enjoy,

Leonardo

In a message dated 11/17/02 6:51:37 AM, global-theosophy@adslhome.dk writes:

>Hi Leon and all of you,
>
>Its quite allright Leon <:-)
>What I meant was:
>When you during the past half year or so - so many times mentiones your
>(so
>very) own book when emailing - and
>your own ABC theory, where you could have chosen a different path - of
>text
>or emailing - then I see a tendency.
>And that tendency is, that it seems to me, that you stick to much with
>your
>book and your ABC -theory - more
>than it is profitable for you and others.
>And there it is i get the "Salesman" view into my mind. Not that I think
>you
>support egoism or anything like that,
>but just this view i mentioned in the above.
>
>One could suggest, that you made a theory (i.e. maybe a book) on poetry
>or
>art or the like, so that you get another view than the so very very
>scientific one. Maybe a poetic version of your ABC theory ?
>Sometimes the author sticks to his creation - the book - like glue. And
>he
>is always out to defend it, whenever he is talking or emailing with
>others, - or at least he is alert on the issue. Well, if you get my drift.
><:-)
>Of course one - maybe - will have to defend the book from time to time.
>
>It is just that I see a tendency, nothing else.
>Maybe I am the only one.
>I know I am a little personal here, but I really honestly mean well.
>And I think that, you Leon, have the stomach for it.
>
>I will also admit, that I am a little low on the scientific versions myself.
>But, that is probably because I think the world has had to much of this,
>and
>needs reason - i.e. PEACE and not more dangerous weapons created by science
>minds, who gets facinated more than they use their common sense.
>Especially HPB was very good at throwing "common sense" in her articles,
>where she had to explain the stupid scholars what Theosophy really was
>and
>is.
>
>Have I missed the point?
>
>
>
>from
>M. Sufilight with...the best whises...and peace...