Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00565)

In a message dated 11/16/02 5:01:28 AM, micforster@yahoo.com writes:

>
>Leon you say:
>
>"All causal relationships between fields should be
>determined by analogy and correspondence - since all
>fields are interdependently originated from a common
>non-local zero-point center and are "in coadunition
>but not in consubstantiality.""
>
>Could you please elaborate on your definition of a
>field?
>
>Cheers, mic

With respect to my ABC theory, such "coadunate but not consubstantial fields" 
are electrically coenergetic spherical hyperspace regions, like bubbles 
within bubbles within bubbles, etc. -- that are analogous in their various 
stages or levels of substantiality or frequency/energy phase (or "order") to 
the scientific "field" of the lowest order 3-dimensional physical, "metric" 
or observed space, which is defined as follows: 

"A region of space characterized by a physical property, such as 
gravitational or electromagnetic force or fluid pressure, having a 
determinable value at every point in the region" (American Heritage 
Dictionary) 

Such coenergetic hyperspace "fields" are identical to the seven fold (or 
more) involved "fields of action," "planes," or "states of consciousness" 
described by HPB in the SD. For a visualization of the involution of such 
fields, see the symbolic cross sectional energy flow diagrams at:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html

LHM
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/ABC_bw.html