Theos-Talk Archives (October 2002 Message tt00245)

--- In theos-talk@y..., Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> It is interesting that in Bailey's "channeled" works, the 
racism, while
> still there, is far less pronounced than in the works she wrote on 
her
> own. 

I consider Bailey to be altogether unworthy of notice. Nonetheless, 
in the Mahatma Letters, etc., there is a good deal of discussion 
of "inferior" races and how they have to go. If it were true that 
races Blavatsky considered "inferior" were dying out except in the 
case of deliberate genocide then the theory might have some basis in 
fact, but it appeares to me that as things are it is not only 
unsupported but dangerous.

Once we get away from the anthropological speculations I agree with 
Leon that Theosophy as presented by Blavatsky (forget all the later 
impostors such as Bailey, leadbeater, etc.) is of conbsiderable value.