[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 29, 2002 08:51 AM
by Steve Stubbs
--- In theos-talk@y..., "Dennis Kier" <dennw3k@e...> wrote: > > If you are referring to Israel as the oppressor, and the > Palestinians > > as the oppressed, learn some history. The Palestinians were trying > to > > destroy Israel. They made war against Israel. They lost. That's how > > Israel ended up with the West Bank. And the Palestinians STILL have > the > > primary goal of the destruction of the State of Israel. > > > > Admittedly, the Palestinians, when the State of Israel was created, > > didn't oppress the Jews who were living among them. They just killed > > them and seized their land. Some points: (1) It is not true that Muslims in the mideast never oppressed Jews. It was to escape the oppression of Muslim rulers that the Sephardic Jews established the first Zionist communities in Palestine. It is because this oppression has come to an end that the non-Palestinian Muslims hate the "state of Israel" so much, and not because of the plight of the Palestinians, about whom they do not give a damn. The fantasy that Muslim rulers were really nice to Jews prior to 1900 is taught in Israeli schools along with other historical lies. (2) It is true that said rulers did not rule Russia or Poland and were therefore not responsible for the pogroms that took place in those territories. The Russian and Polish Jews who emigrated to Palestine never were the victims of mideast Muslim oppression while in European Russia. (3) It is Israel which waged war against the Arabs in 1967 and seized the West Bank. (4) There are a lot of people in Israel who do not belong to the Likud Party and neither revere nor respect the Commandant of Unit 101. Some of these people think peace in their homes is preferable to the "transfer" progfram and the ongoing land grab beyond their borders. Regardless of which side of the argument you come down on, it is simply a fact that not everyone is of one mind on this. The policy of the Sharonistas is leaving the descendants of the people who currently rule Palestine with a terrible legacy. The Latin Kingdom lasted 148 years, but it fell, and "Israel" has been around just over 1/3 of that time. Moreover, it is situated in a corner of the world where the Crusades, fought 800 years ago, are considered a iiving memory and contemporary history. It is inevitable that the Arabs will raptriate the land which is rightfully theirs. It is also inevitable that the Jews will creats as much hard feeling as possible between now and then, making the retribution that is taken a terrible one indeed. If there were any sanity in the world, the Commandant and his worshippers would be looking to build bridges and not walls. The idea that there is going to be a permanent, ethnicall cleansed and purified "Israel" with a wall around it and a sign saying "Arabs get out" is pure fantasy. They are trying to do something that simply is not doavle. I listened to a radio interview on Fresh Air yesterday in which Terri Gross interviewed some Fundamentalist Christian. (Tapes and transcripts can be ordered over the Internet if you are interested.) She also interviewed some Jewish guy named Gershom something who wrote a book about all this called The End of Days. The Fundamentalists are urging Jews to go to Palestine to prepare for what they think is going to he the final holocaust, in which 2/3 of them will be wiped out and the remainder will become "born again" Christians. Iwas laughing out loud when I first heard that, but then it occurred to e that scenario may not be all that far fetched. It is not unreasonable to extrapolate to that outcome from the current state of affairs.