[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 25, 2002 08:20 AM
by Steve Stubbs
--- In theos-talk@y..., "brianmuehlbach" <brianmuehlbach@y...> wrote: > It might be noted that on 9 June, 1978, > the Mormon hierarchy announced that black-skinned persons would > thereafter enjoy Ôall of the privileges and blessings which the gospel > affords. There is one part of the story that has been left out here. As I recall, their "prophet, seer, and revelator" had a "revelation" regarding this which some cynics (including myself) think was motivated by threats from the federal government that they would soon present him with a "revelation" of their own. Apparently some of the racist policies of the mormon church were in violation of federal civil rights statutes. When polygamy and other mormon religious practices were outlawed, their "prophet, seer, and revelator" had other "revelations" at strategic intervals which nullified previous "revelations" and brought them into compliance with the law. It appears their theology is formulated largely in the courtroom and not in ethereal regions. As for the statement by someone else that the Tasmanians were "dying out anyway," (a phrase which seems to have some sort of implication) he is mistaken. Blavatsky said the "Australians" (i.e., the suriving Australian aborigines) and not the Tasmanians were "rapidly dying out." The Tasmanians were already gone, and it was not that they were "dying out anyway" but that they were systematically exterminated. There is no evidence that they were "dying out anyway" prior to the genocidal effort, and the aborigines are no longer "rapidly dying out" now that the genocide against them has been discontinued. So in this instance history offers nothing to support the cycle theory, and we should not apologize for genocide, IMHO.