theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: spinergy

Sep 20, 2002 02:49 AM
by leonmaurer


Hi Mic,

I hope you don't mind my answering you with a public letter to the Theosophy 
list.

Thank you for your interest. My ideas of why and how the zero-point and its 
spinergy is the origin of both consciousness and matter, came about after 
years of concentrated study of (and meditation on) the Secret Doctrine -- 
using references to modern scientific theories (relativity, quantum dynamics, 
Superstrings, etc.) only to find out their areas of agreement with my 
geometrization and chemical-physiological interpretation of HPB's theories. 
(She did tell us to write our own Secret Doctrines, didn't she? ;-)

This check of modern scientific references came after I had completely worked 
out the projective geometry of the field "involution" processes that occurred 
during the period of "inflation" prior to "the breaking of symmetry" (and the 
start of the "evolution" processes). As for the physiology and 
electrochemistry (that HPB stated would be the key to a scientific validation 
of theosophical metaphysics) -- pertaining to my theory of how vision worked 
in the brain and pineal theater in conjunction with higher order radiant 
fields of consciousness (mind, memory, etc.)... Knowledge of those areas of 
science were gained during my college level education over 50 years ago (in 
crystallography, physics, biochemistry, material sciences, etc.) as a 
Chemical Engineer. Besides being a natural born and academically trained 
artist, I also have a background on the cutting edge of computer graphic 
animation systems development, having been a technical consultant (based on 
my video and motion picture special effects expertise) in the early days of 
pioneering CGI, CAD and computer assisted animation R & D that led to modern 
day motion picture SFX and 3-D animation in such films as Star Wars, TRON, 
Toy Story, Monsters, Lord of the Rings, etc. Much of this was a great aid in 
helping me see the nature of things in all their multi-spatial, and 
multidimensional, particle-wave transparency, even before I opened the Secret 
Doctrine. 

The accepted materialistic "scientific" theories, on the other hand, still do 
not have a complete picture, since they are based on the measurable material 
forces starting with the first particle-wave or "quanta." Therefore, even 
with the ten dimensional Superstring/M-brane theory, they haven't yet 
considered that "the contents of consciousness" (e.g., as visual mind images) 
is outside of the material mass-energy fields and within the earlier 
involved, immaterial, "coadunate, but not consubstantial" (ref: SD) zero 
point fields (in the space between the zero-point and the smallest measurable 
or calculable physical "particle," or between the electron and the proton)... 
Or, that individualized self awareness could be the inherent nature of the 
static zero point itself -- which, upon manifestation, is everywhere at the 
center and poles of all multi-phased non-metric hyper-spatial fields and 
metric ("physical") fields. 

Doesn't this make it evident that all fields in the universe are conscious? 
Doesn't it also give credence to the idea that the primal fields, "Chohans" 
or "Builders" were conscious beings? Isn't it also obvious that the absolute 
"emptiness" of the unmoving (static) zero-point is the basis, or unchanging 
reference, for our relativistic judgments about the "fullness" and linear 
motion of this changing material world? And, that it's also the basis of the 
counter force we call "inertia"? Doesn't it also give much food for thought 
as to the inevitability of both karma and reincarnation? All of this is 
thoroughly explained in the SD -- (although not as directly linked to modern 
and postmodern physics, as in the ABC theory). 

As far as I know, there are no peer reviewed and published scientific papers 
that consider this ABC unified field theory concept, and all of its 
conclusions, as the true basis of fundamental reality... Other than some 
scientific papers that speculate that the universe is a holographic unity, 
and attempts to fit that in with conventional relativity and quantum physics 
as well as with some of the recent developments in M-brane theory -- that 
considers the universe as having ten dimensions -- four, visible and 
measurable (including time), and six, hidden and immeasurable (which, 
incidentally, is getting pretty close to the theosophical-ABC view). 

To find out, in both nontechnical and technical terms, how far they have gone 
with such advanced scientific theories (that are still controversial, by the 
way, since non of them yet can explain the experience or "qualia" of 
consciousness, awareness, memory, or brain-mind binding, etc.) check out this 
site:
http://superstringtheory.com/ 

Hope this helps in opening up the circles you are spinning around in. ;-)

Leon(ardo) H(ermes) Maurer
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/ABC_bw.html


In a message dated 09/20/02 12:09:34 AM, micforster@yahoo.com writes:

>Hi Leon,
>
>Your thoughts have been most instructive and I have
>spent much time absorbing them. I am finding now that
>I have finally reached a point in my personal research
>where I am going around in circles and am ending up
>finding articles/ideas which I have already found
>before. I am sure you have also reached such a point
>in your own research.
>
>I am finding that everything is revolving around the
>wave function and hence, according to your reasoning,
>the spinergy initiated through the big-bang (well
>something along these lines anyway). Are these ideas
>that you have gathered yourself through scientific and
>theosophical studies? Or is there a reference in a
>scientific journal that you can direct me towards that
>is also saying something along these lines?
>
>Thanks for your help,
>Mic Forster


[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application