Theos-Talk Archives (July 2002 Message tt00076)

--- Frank Reitemeyer <dhyana@web.de> wrote:
> By the way, the aggressive Hamas movement was since
> years armed by Israel's
> Mossad

Well, yes, unfortunately, Mossad is regarded by
experts on terrorism as a terrorist organization. I
listened to a British expert lecture on that subject
years ago. He said that Abu Nidal had long since been
assassinated at the time he spoke, and that his name
was used by Mossad to cover up their own activities. 
In other words, the public was told these things had
been done by Abu Nidal whereas members of the
intelligence community knew very well they were Mossad
operations. That was rather worrisome because at the
time of the lecture "Abu Nidal" was being blamed for a
lot of awful things around the world even though he
had long since been tracked down and killed. There
are undoubtedly other dead people being blamed for
atrocious things today.

It is unfortunately also true that covertly promoting
terrorism is seen somehow as a way to promote the
interests of the Israeli elite, although for the life
of me I canno figure out how they arrive at that
conclusion. They are themselves protected by powerful
security organizations. It is the man in the street
who pays the price for their policies. Menachem Begin
and Nobel Peace Prize winner Rabin are gone. The
Commandant of Unit 101 is in his seventies. As the
generation of terrorists die off, let us hope that the
next generation of leaders will have a more sensible
and constructive vision of how to promote the natuinal
interest. Ordinary Jews and Muslims in Palestine
deserve a break.

> I wonder why no TS has anything to say on this?

The TS is pretty much irrelevant in the modern world. 
As for a man committing suicide, people do that all
the time for personal reasons. There is no reason to
suspect foul play if the police conducted a proper
investigation as I assume they did.

One thing I am not clear about is what you are getting
at regarding modern events. W does not give a damn
about anything except the Bush family fortune. All of
his policies (repealing inheritance taxes, appointing
oil execs to key positions in his administration,
etc.) are centered around expanding the Bush oil
fortune and making sure he ends up with it after his
father and mother pass away. He is using his office
to promote his self interest, but I don't believe
there is anything sinister there in the sense that you
imply.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com