Theos-Talk Archives (July 2002 Message tt00068)

Hi Frank and all,

Interesting comment in the below from you Frank.
I won't say I disagree.

But what was it you disagreed with on my part ?
Frank wrote in the below:
"I heartly argree with what Morten and mkr comment below."

Can you help me out ?

from
Sufilight with wonders and moving movements...



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dhyana@web.de>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Germany: to protect or not to protect? Sufis


> I heartly argree with what Morten and mkr comment below.
> Yes, the early theosophists were not politically correct at their times.
> When HPB noticed that a supernational organization was in attempt to destroy
> the nationality of India she went there and founded a national movement to
> counteract these attacks.
> When she noticed that these black forces were in attempt to take over London
> she moved there and established her headquarters there to counteract these
> attacks, although the dark powers banned her magazine Lucifer from all shops
> on which they had a monopoly.
> When Katherine Tingley notived that these evil forces were in attempt to
> take over USA and counteract the policy of Washington and Lincoln she
> supported the national movement of Edward Bellamy which was also supported
> by HPB as can be seen from her comment in her "Key".
> But in the last consequence KT seems to have been not overall success as the
> "invisible government" (US Pres. Th. Roosevelt) over the Warburgs and
> Rotschilds was able in 1913 to take complete control over the US.
> But I think it was not a personal failure for KT, the reason why she has had
> not the success which would have been necessary to ban the evil forces was
> the bad condition of the Theos. Movement and there vorious counterforces
> from within who fightet against her policy, although she was elected by
> 5,000 delegates present at convention who represented the theosophists the
> world over.
> In his 1912 election campaign Theodore Roosevelt said (in my humble
> retransl.): "Behind the visible goverment there is sitting a invisible
> government on her throne, which is not responsible to the citizens and
> recognizes no responsibility. It is the task of the the statesman to destroy
> this invisible government, this godless alliance between corrupt business
> and corrupt politics."
> 
> I think was Roosevelt said is the same as HPB said in her "Key", but today
> we see that this corrupt policy is not limited to the USA alone, it has
> spread around the world after several plots succeeded and today we have next
> to no free nation anymore. Nearly all nations are ritual slaughtered by the
> background illuminati.
> 
> MKR, you are right. Theosophists and the TS's should stand up and speak out
> loud. But until today I have heard nothing, either from Pasadena, Adyar or
> ULT. I think they are either infiltrated by the background powers or they
> have decided to go the Prateyka way and are satisfied with themselves that
> have the truth and nothing as the truth and the rest of the world my go now
> into ARMAGEDDON. In either way the official policy of all 3 so-called
> "theosophical" organizations is not the way of HPB.
> Frank
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ramadoss@gbronline.com>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Germany: to protect or not to protect? Sufis
> 
> 
> At 06:31 PM 7/2/02 +0200, Morten Sufilight wrote:
> >Theosophy at the sideline ?
> 
> Right question.
> In the early days, theosophists took active interest on various issues
> relating to the welfare of the oppressed people and espoused causes which
> were not politically correct at that time. But things changed.
> 
> May be it is time for theosophists to stand up and do what they can to
> alleviate those suffering masses.
> 
> This can be done concurrent with other studies and discussions and
> spiritual practices.
> 
> mkr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>