Theos-Talk Archives (March 2002 Message tt00486)

Brigitte Muehlegger wrote:

"I gave my opinion if one carefully reads my 11 part essay on the 
who and what the Masters of Theosophy are, and also an answer to the 
specific question below...."

I assume that Muehlegger's mention of "the specific question below" 
refers to my question which reads:

"What are Muehlegger's conclusions considering Olcott's Encounters 
with Other Masters? . . . In each of the 4 cases listed below (see 
web page for each case) which hypothesis do you prefer for each
case?"

http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya79bm.htm
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya80bm.htm
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepgoldtem80bm.htm
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya81bm.htm

I have re-read Muehlegger's "11 part essay on the who and what the 
Masters of Theosophy are" and fail to find anything of substance that 
would give Muehlegger's views about THESE FOUR CASES.

Did I miss something?? If any other reader of this "11 part 
essay" found something on this specific subject which I overlooked, 
please post it. 

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm
"...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things
at their right value; and unless a judge compares
notes and hears both sides he can hardly come to a
correct decision."
H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.