Theos-Talk Archives (March 2002 Message tt00005)

Dear Mic:

Seems to me, for inertia to proceed, there has to always be an
initial impulse, a cause. A process may continue indefinitely
under the laws of inertia, providing there is absence of
friction -- but your illustrations appear to invoke the presence
of many more factors than are superficially apparent, or am I
wrong ?

As a matter of observation the decomposition of matter, seems
always to provide "food< for further growth. Consider the facts
of digestion in the human body, as an instance. How else do
foods and water provide new structural bases for bodily
maintenance and repair except through the innate intelligence of
billions of disparate cells, and who or what guides or instituted
that. Our of the apparent contamination of chyle new sustenance
is continually extracted.

All forces have cause and all trace back to an impulse starting
on some plane other than the physical. This is what the astral,
the pranic and the kamic divisions illustrate and imply. At
least that is how I understand it.



Best wishes,

Dallas

-----Original Message-----
From: Mic Forster [mailto:micforster@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:58 PM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Theos-World Inertia


Would the following be regarded as a form of inertia?

Litter on a forest floor decomposing at a certain rate relative
to the aging of a human body.

That is to say they are both in uniform motion though are moving
at different rates. Though an external force can be applied to
the human body to let it age and eventually decompose at the same
rate as litter on a forest floor. Hence decomposition is just
another word for aging and vice-versa.



---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/