Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00744)

Brigitte, you write:

"Dean I. Radin's book . . . is much more up to date,
yet denies the medium/materialisation con as a
reality."

Where in Radin's book does the author deny 
the "medium/materialisation con as a reality." Pages
please??

Why is mediumship a "con"? Where are your sources to
show that this is true?

For those who would like an excellent and thoughtful
overview of mediumship, see the book "Mediumship and 
Survival : A Century of Investigations" by Dr. Alan
Gauld. Yes, Brigite, I realize it was published in
1984 and you will say it is too old. But do you have a
more recent title that you can recommend on the same 
subject?

Enough for now.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm
"...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things
at their right value; and unless a judge compares
notes and hears both sides he can hardly come to a
correct decision."
H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.








__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com