Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00478)

There are perhaps three instances. I may be wrong about the timing of the 
first one which seems to have taken place soon after he formally joined TS. 
The first and third instances, as I recall, were of some personal advise. 
The second one was when he got the information which was the basis for his 
book on Seven Rays. As I recall, there was a discussion about the first and 
third instances in one of his books. When I am able to locate the exact 
reference, I will post a msg.

mkr

At 03:13 AM 2/15/02 +0000, you wrote:
> Reg."there is the case of communication that Ernest Wood had even
> before he was in TS."
>
> Could you give us some details about the content of these
> communications and when where they where exactly received ?
>
> Bri.
>
> --- In theos-talk@y..., ramadoss@i... wrote:
> > At 12:41 PM 2/13/02 -0500, Larry F Kolts wrote:
> > >If, however, it were true, as Paul seemed to allude to, that the
> attitude
> > >within TS-Adyar is that only those within the Eoteric Section have
> a
> > >right to messages from the Masters, then such an attitude would
> represent
> > >every bit as much a fundimentalist position as those in ULT. In
> fact,
> > >that exclusivity mindset would be akin to the Roman Catholic
> postion that
> > >the Pope is the Vicar of Christ or the Mormon postion that their
> > >President,Prophet, Seer and Revelator is the sole recipient of
> > >revelations from God.
> > >
> > >So I ask again, does anyone know of this position? I would
> actually love
> > >to be told- no way, that not at all how we think-but I believe it
> > >important to have all the cards on the table in this matter and
> all be
> > >open and honest if we are to reach any sort of consensus.
> >
> > I do not know what the belief/attitude in TS-Adyar is. This issue
> of
> > communications with Mahatmas, it is worth noting that in the early
> days,
> > there were many communications from Mahatmas to many who were not
> in any
> > was associated with TS. Also, there is the case of communication
> that
> > Ernest Wood had even before he was in TS. I see no reason why there
> should
> > be any change.
> >
> > >My second question was a historical one. Who is the last person to
> have
> > >claimed to have recieved as message from a Master? Let's get that
> far if
> > >we can and then I'll comment further depending on what the facts
> are. No
> > >sense laying an elaborate foundation for something that may turn
> out to
> > >be a straw man.
> >
> > The last widely acknowledged communication was a letter in 1900
> from KH to
> > Annie Besant in which KH mentions about esoteric popery!
> >
> > mkr
> >
> > >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/