Reg."there is the case of communication that Ernest Wood had even
before he was in TS."
Could you give us some details about the content of these
communications and when where they where exactly received ?
Bri.
--- In theos-talk@y..., ramadoss@i... wrote:
> At 12:41 PM 2/13/02 -0500, Larry F Kolts wrote:
> >If, however, it were true, as Paul seemed to allude to, that the
attitude
> >within TS-Adyar is that only those within the Eoteric Section have
a
> >right to messages from the Masters, then such an attitude would
represent
> >every bit as much a fundimentalist position as those in ULT. In
fact,
> >that exclusivity mindset would be akin to the Roman Catholic
postion that
> >the Pope is the Vicar of Christ or the Mormon postion that their
> >President,Prophet, Seer and Revelator is the sole recipient of
> >revelations from God.
> >
> >So I ask again, does anyone know of this position? I would
actually love
> >to be told- no way, that not at all how we think-but I believe it
> >important to have all the cards on the table in this matter and
all be
> >open and honest if we are to reach any sort of consensus.
>
> I do not know what the belief/attitude in TS-Adyar is. This issue
of
> communications with Mahatmas, it is worth noting that in the early
days,
> there were many communications from Mahatmas to many who were not
in any
> was associated with TS. Also, there is the case of communication
that
> Ernest Wood had even before he was in TS. I see no reason why there
should
> be any change.
>
> >My second question was a historical one. Who is the last person to
have
> >claimed to have recieved as message from a Master? Let's get that
far if
> >we can and then I'll comment further depending on what the facts
are. No
> >sense laying an elaborate foundation for something that may turn
out to
> >be a straw man.
>
> The last widely acknowledged communication was a letter in 1900
from KH to
> Annie Besant in which KH mentions about esoteric popery!
>
> mkr
>
> >
