[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Questions to Steve Stubbs about the Ooton Liatto Case and other cases

Feb 07, 2002 04:53 PM
by danielhcaldwell

Dear Steve,

Thanks for your posting at: 

I gather from what you write that you are in complete agreement with 
K. Paul Johnson that in the Ooton Liatto Case two "physically present 
people [were] conversing with Olcott....". [see Case A at ]

In other words, you maintain that the two men in Olcott's apartment 
were NOT imaginary figments of Olcott's hallucination but real flesh 
and blood human beings. I also assume you agree with Johnson that 
these two men were ADEPTS. 

Steve, am I right in what I write above?

Moving to the next related issue.

>From what you have written at , may we safely 
assume that you also accept "at face value" the other cases cited at: 

For example, in Cases B, C and F, Olcott reports that his Master 
[Morya] came to visit and talk with him. In light of what you have 
written, I am assuming that you accept that a real physical person 
came to visit Olcott on each of these occasions. And furthermore 
that this person was Blavatsky's Master who used the pseudonym M. Am 
I right in making these assumptions?

One more example: In Case D, Olcott testified he saw "one of the 
Masters" at the Golden Temple in Amritsar. Do you accept that a real 
flesh and blood man gave HPB and Olcott each a rose? 

Thanking you in advance for your further input and clarification of 
your position. 

Daniel H. Caldwell

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application