Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00048)

I completely agree with conjev. Some things that HPB says science did not agree with in her day science certainly does agree with these days - especially in the areas of quantum physics and the nature of the atom. Though one area which I think is very important, and as yet has hardly (as far as I know) been addressed by science or theosophy, is that of synchronicity. This phenomena is so widespread and obvious that it can be seen everyday. Yet when I bring it up with my fellow scientist they merely scoff at the concept. Clearly there is still a lot of learning to be done by all sides - science and theosophy.


cronjev <cronjev@hotmail.com> wrote: Theosophy was a relatively recent discovery for me, and I have found 
all written matter I have come across up till now very informative.

I do find however that most of the discussion revolves around the 
concepts of the Universe as it viewed and documented a hundred years 
back.

>From what I understood of the definition of Theosophy, is that it 
should try to explain everything, reconciling science with religion 
and mysticism.

How much new ideas and concepts have been developed in recent years, 
and where can you read about it?

A zealous newbie ...

(I have put down the Universe as I understand it in a badly written 
form www.geocities.com/cronjev - I need more information.)




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions Great stuff seeking new owners! Bid now!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]