Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00405)

Sufilight, in view of your remarks below, I am uncomfortable pursuing this
dialogue any further. Please forgive my intrusion into your world.

Bill

----------
> From: Morten Sufilight <teosophy@mail1.stofanet.dk>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World RE: Did Blavatsky smoke hashish and drink
alcohol?
> Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:33 PM
> 
> Hi Ho Bill, and you all on the list,
> 
> Thanks for your remarks.
> I have insereted som remarks in the below - using * - stars.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Meredith" <bilmer@surfsouth.com>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World RE: Did Blavatsky smoke hashish and drink
alcohol?
> 
> 
> > Hi Ho Sufilight,
> > 
> > ----------
> > > From: Morten Sufilight <teosophy@mail1.stofanet.dk>
> > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: Theos-World RE: Did Blavatsky smoke hashish and drink
> > alcohol?
> > > Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:11 PM
> > > 
> > > Hi, Dallas,
> > > 
> > > I can only agree a whole lot with the below remarks of yours Dallas.
> > > A very good email Dallas. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > But I also agree, that anyone should be allowed to say or email, what
> > they want on this list - on the issue Theosophy - as long as they are
> > sincerely interested in knowing about, what Theosophy is - and what it
> > possibly could have to offer. Or if they have questions to ask - etc.
> > 
> > How can you possibly know which of us are "sincerely interested" and
which
> > of us are just insincerely interested? Who is pulling whose chain
here? 
> > What do you propose to do with those you judge to be insincere? 
> > 
> ***The cat doesn't show it self - but its footprints does ! The crew
behind Theos-talk - is pulling the chain - I just make remarks - and get a
debate started. - I don't decide anything on what to do with anyone. So I
couldn't really tell.***
> > > 
> > > I think: But let us also remember - that 'intellectual facts'
> > theosophically speaking are limited in their view on truth as such -
when
> > talking about 'emails' etc.
> > 
> > Excellent thought! Let us also remember that those who worship at the
> > alter of Theosophy worship just the same. Do you have children? Is it
> > your heartfelt desire that they worship you? Where else can we look
for
> > answers?
> 
> ***Theosophy has nothing at all to do with fanatism - as you seem think
in the above. We seek wisdom - and others reject that idea - and that is
that. 
> Please - leave my children out of this -- please. 
> Where do you get the idea that - anyone should - worship anyone - in that
manner, which you (more than one time) seem to have talked about it. Wisdom
- doesn't imply 'worship' in the sense, which you put forward here - in
fact I would say no worship at all. I would call it wise communication
instead.
> Theosophists studies wisdom etc. - others only study materialism ! -
Before you answer this email - please read the article by Blavatsky - "Is
Theosophy a Religion?" - written 1888. - I think that will make something
clear to you - and maybe others.***
> > 
> > 
> > > But that is just my humble view.
> > > 
> > > from Sufilight
> > 
> > Sufilight, when I read what you offer, the word humble does not come to
my
> > mind. Do you want to know which word does? Or does it matter?
> 
> ***Well, that is your view. And I read it. But what are the words - they
could be important to mention - if so come with them - but I would suggest,
that you only do it if they have a moral bearing.***
> > 
> > Bill
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

>