Theos-Talk Archives (November 2001 Message tt00346)

Does anyone have a picture from the 1895 Strand magazine that has a
picture of the 12 foot Giant found - this of course proves our Giants
first evolution.

Nos



|-----Original Message-----
|From: Nisk98114@aol.com [mailto:Nisk98114@aol.com] 
|Sent: Monday, 19 November 2001 2:30 AM
|To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: Re: Theos-World THE SEVEN DAUGHTERS OF EVE
|
|
|Steve,
|One wonders at the part that Archetypes play in all this 
|"bone" finding. Has one had the Transcendant Archetypal 
|vision? And if so can "bone" finding be a blessing or a curse? 
|For instance , if i am looking for you and i find a book you 
|may have read 
|but not you am i any closer to finding you , per say?
|Just some food for thought.
|=============================
|Subj: Re: Theos-World THE SEVEN DAUGHTERS OF EVE
|Date: 11/18/01 10:46:31 AM Eastern Standard Time
|From: stevestubbs@yahoo.com (Steve Stubbs)
|Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com";>
|theos-talk@yahoogroups.com</A>
|To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
|
|Brigitte:
|
|Well, actually, my intent was not to "contradict" you
|exactly, but to add to the discussion.
|
|Sykes claims the mitochondrial DNA is passed down
|through the MATERNAL lineage and not the PATERNAL
|lineage as you suggest. I am not saying who is right
|and who is wrong, simply quoting Sykes' statement.
|
|Also, you ask "How do we adjust the Secret Doctrine ?"
|and I pointed out that the fact that Europeans all
|come from SEVEN primordial women seems to dovetail
|eerily with Blavatsky's theories.
|
|Let me say again that Blavatsky has presented in my
|judgement an admirable psychological model, but I do
|not take it that seriously in regard to matters 
|anthropological. It is obvious the psychological model ws 
|constructed first and the anthropological model afterward, 
|probably after studying Wallace's books on spiritualism and evolution.
|
|Steve
|
| 
|
|Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
|http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
|
|