Re: Theos-World forcing democracy upon other countries
Oct 23, 2001 07:33 PM
by DANIEL J HOUGAS
You seem kind of interventionist. Why do you think we should intervene in other countries internal political struggles? I think our leaders in this country could take a lesson in the saying "Back to the future", we need to rediscover some of our past history in order to get on with the future. The founding fathers would role over in there graves if they knew what kind of country were turning out to be. Like I said, we need to be an example for the world, by being interventionist were turning out just to be another country whose trying to run the world. We want change in these countries, but it has to be at there speed not ours. Also, don't you believe the European democracies could do a lot more to further the message of freedom and democracy. It seems we have lost our way a little bit, and we no longer follow a lot of the truth and ideas this country was founded on. Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: Eldon B Tucker
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:56 PM
Subject: Theos-World forcing democracy upon other countries
At 06:36 PM 10/23/01 -0600, you wrote:
> Isn't it true that a lot of the founding fathers of our
> nation were mostly freemasons and had a occult backround, they believed
> democracy was the highest of ideals for mankind. They believed we should
> be an example for the world, Reagans shining city on the hill. We should
> start being the example, and stop going into the parts of the world we
> don't belong. To be an example is to show people, not shove it down
> their throats. If they are going to become free and democratic they need
> to come to that decision themselves, not kicking and screaming. What do
> you think HPB would of thought?
I'm not sure it matters what she might have thought.
It matters what we think. I think we may have drifted
away from trying to remake the work in our image.
It's always a problem when we decide what to do when
another country suffers under a malevolent government.
Do we leave them alone? Do we deal with the government
and not interfere in its internal affairs? Or do we
try to help along the process of change where it'll
eventually fall to something hopefully better? I thing
our tendency has been do turn and look the other way.
I'm not sure it's always the right thing to do. Some
countries are too big to do anything about, like China.
I see our current refocus on world affairs being driven
by the current world threat -- that of potential use
of weapons of mass destruction against western civilian
populations. This is so dangerous that any tendency
towards isolationism has to be put aside, literally under
the threat of death. Apart from hopefully rare situations
like this, I'd agree that we don't meddle in other
countries governments, but only provide general assistance,
helping the countries improve to the point where there
will be a natural political evolution from within.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application