Theos-Talk Archives (October 2001 Message tt00002)

Monday, October 01, 2001

Dear Friend:

A warning ought to precede every positing:

Read, study, compare, find out if it is universal and impersonal.
Use only if you find out it is useful and true.

All "tables" or "Statements" are opinions advanced for our
independent consideration.

They were or are of use to the students who originate and publish
them.

It is like saying: Here is a house. Here are doors and windows
to let in the air and light and to use to enter or to leave. The
use of those facilities are up to you who become the habitants.
So are all ideas when presented to an active mind.
It is up t each individual to see if they provide additional
insight on problems of personal or universal significance.

No one ought to adopt anything without careful scrutiny.

Best wishes,

Dallas

========================

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:03 AM
To:
Subject: [SECRET DOCTRINE study: Table...

Dear Friend:

It is quite possible to dig up a number of tables that claim
description and precedence over those provided to us by the
Mahatmas through H.P.Blavatsky.

Those were provided AFTER H P B's death -- so she had no
opportunity under Karma to write about them.

Apparently one of the invariable laws of occultism is that no
"prophet" or "messenger" may break the walls of silence that veil
the present EGO and its after-life condition from imposture,
criticism, and claims of authority made after the physical
personality that was used died.

The ORIGINAL TEACHINGS still stand as a monument to what was
actually taught and said. If those are not studied with great
care the arguments that may be offered at later dates cannot be
verified or reported on with accuracy.

We are in such a position in regard to information about planes
or states that are claimed to be earlier, different or superior
to what is called in philosophical metaphysics in ancient India:
PARABRAHM.

CUT