Theos-Talk Archives (August 2001 Message tt00066)

Nick:
Leaving aside the reason for Crosbie's expulsion, I can state that the membership book is not "imaginary". In 1979 Boris de Zirkoff was shown this book and
his written testimony confirms its existence and the accuracy of Frank's quoting of the Crosbie entry.
Although Leon may not believe this, I am only mentioning this fact because I value truth -- whether comfortable or painful.

Frank:
It does not matter whether this or that partyliner believe it or not. Facts are facts. Osho followers do not believe that he brought 99 Rolls Royce from their money. Chrtsian followers to not believe that reincarnation exists. Material scientists do not believe that living beings have souls.

(1) Until today no ULT'er has presented any proof for their claim that Robert Crosbie left the TS by "free will". 

(2) Furthermore when they allege that the entry "expelled" is an evilly fake by someone they have until today also never presented any proof. 
A good proof would be a letter of Crosbie wherein he declares his leaving.

(3) Furthermore they have until today not given any rationale why in 1905 someone at headquarters should write "expelled" instead "expired". Was Crosbie so important then? Of course not. That is paranoid gossip. It was not ununsual that members resigned which were too weak to follow the original programme of the TS. Why then should anyone at HQs try to cover up that he was leaving "by free will" - if it were so.

(4) That in 1905 there were some members jealously is a matter of record. That Crosbie showed such a character is unintentionally proofed by his chapter "Judge'S death - and after" in his book "The Theosophical Movement" which such an orgy of untrue, unjust, untheosophical slanders, lies and twisted facts about KT's personality (and her pupils) - despite the fact that the ULT'ers - "5th rounders in an 4th round environment" (Dallas) - claim not to deal with personalities - but that rule seems to be only a protection for the own fake stories.

Here is an interesting note to all whom it may concern:

"Note
The personal mention to our comrade, Professor G. de Purucker, is made in answer to a malicious statement made by an enemy of our Organization who, in seeking to hurt its influence, has tried to delude a few people by correspondence and otherwise. This person states that Comrade G. de Purucker came as a stranger to Point Loma from the opposing faction, and is now working in the interest of secret enemies. The statements made by the Leader clearly dispose of all this, and show that he was one of the old members, known and trusted by William Q. Judge. These statements were made by the Leader in a talk she gave to the students, and were not then intended for publication, but as they form a link in the historic event of obtaining the site of the School of Antiquity [in which GdeP, becoming secretary to KT, was much involved, FR], it was thought that it would be of interest to members to know the facts.
J.H.F."
- The Searchlight, Oct. 15th, 1905, notice between pp. 26-27.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]