Theos-Talk Archives (August 2001 Message tt00040)

>Your "master race" philosophy of labeling people -- not of your self
>righteous ilk, who may need theosophy to help them reach "self
realization,"
>and in the process, strengthen their character -- as "weak" or "neurotic,"
>and excluding them as worthless members of our theosophical brotherhood, is
>in direct violation of theosophical principles that prove "universal
>brotherhood" is a "law of nature." It is also in direct contradiction to
the
>objects of the Theosophical Movement that, right from the beginning,
regarded

Leon, let me quote what Dr. Stoke's has to say about that matter (O.E.
Library Critic, June 9, 1920, second to last p.):

"The Theosophical Society was not founded, if we are rightly informed, for
the purpose of getting as many different sorts of people as possible
together under one roof, although it is open to all. It was founded with the
design of promulgating the knowledge and the practise of certain fundamental
truths and principles, absent from or forgotten by the world at large. Once
given these principles, it was left to itself to act on and to guard them;
it was placed on its good behavior. No spirit of tolerance or of neutrality
can be allowed to go to the extent of allowing it to be shifted into other
or reactionary paths; every influence not in agreement with them must be
held in check."

He expressed it in the very same way I also understood it.

>Any other idea that its the organizational form or its leadership that's
>important, rather than the individual, smacks of the same sort of ersatz
>theosophcal distortions propounded by Hitler in his Mein Kampf. Theosophy
>has no room for nazism, or those that parrot their ideas of dictatorial
>government, and use their propaganda techniques to foment dissension with
the
>aim of destroying groups that don't agree with the "parrots'" dictatorial
and
>fascistic "politics." (It doesn't deserve the distinction of calling it
>"philosophy"). So, start acting llike a real "theosophist," or go form
your
>own dictatorial non-theosophical political party in another forum.

Amazing. Can you give me any proof what Hitler's book has to do with
Theosophy? I have an original edition of that book and I would be glad to
help you out with quotes. Or is that just another example of your invented
accusations?
As you accused several times Katherine Tingley as a dictator too, have you
for this any proof? I think you have some more information in the back,
otherwise you as a good Theosophist would surely not accuse another person
with that qualification.
Thank you for reminding me of being a good Theosophist, although I for one
claim nothing to myself in that direction. But I am quite sure that anyone
who is suffering from paranoia and likewise illness can be no good
Theosophist.
And I am very satisfied with this theos-talk list, I canceled long ago by
membership in the pseudo-theosophical mailing lists on Blavatsky Net, which
are censored and controlled by ULT'ers and present a very rigid, perverted
form of Theosophy. I like this theos-talk, because here free discussion and
exchange of information is allowed, f.e. in which way ULT'ers lie since
decades, in which way the ULT since decades with an untheosophical, biased
and personel mind persecutes the original Theosophy and their messengers.
If such cover ups, open questions and critic about hypocrisy, lies and
slanders makes you on and you cannot hear it as it is against your belief
system, your rigid form of your misinterpretation of Theosophy and you
rather want peace for your soul than the truth and information flow - why
then do you left not this list? I have no problem with that list.
Frank