Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00353)

In a message dated 7/29/2001 3:14:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
parkplace3072@juno.com writes:

> Hi Eldon, I am gratified that there is a forum for the discourse of the
> finer points of possible minor differences in theosophical publications,
> and we can have our personal discoveries pointed out, to illuminate
> students as to the important works and mission of theosophy. But we must
> return to Earth and proceed to our duties, thank you for the most
> entailed exposure, please unlist me ........ adam kadmon
> 

I have noticed many times in the past, that often, the kinds of petty 
bickering that we have seen over the last few weeks, mostly regarding 
judgments and opinions about issues long in the past, surprisingly, amongst 
the most senior Theosophists,
will have this kind of effect on earnest seekers. I cannot help but wonder if 
one of the most honorable theosophical notions, the care and nurture of those 
who are newly awakened, is not being violated here. If we continue to belabor 
the PERCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES of organizational theosophy, when do we find time 
to serve one another with the evolving, LIVING theosophy, of today.

Can we really afford to loose a single, true seeker whose awakening spirit 
has been drawn to the magnetic center of esoteric studies?

Indeed, in moments like these, WHAT STUDIES?

Perhaps another list needs to be started that clearly states, it deals only 
with the BATTLEGROUND ISSUES OF HISTORICAL THEOSOPHY! Could be very popular 
indeed. 

Louis