Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00263)

Thank you Leon for your clarifications.

Leon, you write:

"So, Daniel, Dennis, et al -- why not accept all that at face 
value . . . and STOP these endless loaded questioning attempts to 
recreate ULT in the image of your own organizationally oriented 
prejudices. . . "

But Leon the question in the last day or so was whose view were WE to 
accept at fact value.

You wrote quite plainly:

"For example,many years ago I set up a ULT study group in Florida, 
that . . . could have been chartered by the Parent ULT as an 
independent Lodge.' "

Then Dallas wrote that what you wrote was in error and that there is 
no Parent ULT and therefore it could not charter the said ULT study 
group.

Don't you agree that Dennis et al including myself might have some 
reason to be confused and puzzled by such opposing points of view? 
So whose view were we to take at FACE VALUE --- yours or Dallas'??

But thanks for the clarificaton of your view although I have now 
received more emails from other ULT associates who say that Dallas is 
wrong about this "chartering" business!!

One more thing and I will let this subject drop. You write that 
Dennis and others including myself are trying "to recreate ULT in the 
image of your own organizationally oriented prejudices." What does 
that mean? So we have prejudices in this area but you do not? I 
admit that maybe Dennis and I may not have a clear understanding of 
this subject but I wouldn't call that a prejudice. And since this is 
a theosophical discussion forum, maybe this would be a good place 
where those who really know what is going on could shed some light on 
the confusing subject.

Daniel