Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00196)

>cooperate with one another in all matters. Those who have
>special skills employ them with the permission by consensus and
>conferencing and with the agreement of others. No individual
>scheme is adopted unless there is agreement that it serves to
>advance the spirit of service embodied in the DECLARATION.

That means in other words it is not truth that counts, but majority.
If a majority comes to the conclusion that some sentences of HPB are wrong,
they will publish ULT pamphlets of HPB's articles with altered content,
unknown to the reader.
But in which way the majority is informed by the little group of insiders?
On which basic comes the majority to their conclusions?

Take for example Katherine Tingley. For decades they was labeled as a witch.
Important first source documents about her and the connection with Robert
Crosbie were suppressed, never published. The majority was only given a
one-sided story.
That means in the last consequence, when the majority is misinformed and has
only half information or twisted information then the decision of the
majority cannot be the TRUTH, don't?

If the majority within ULT ranks have had ever the opportunity to see that
Katherine Tingley was a genuine messenger of the Masters and a member of the
White Lodge of Adepts in Transhimalaya and has taught her pupils the
original Theosophy of HPB - I am sure the majority would have found its duty
to come to other conclusions as they came until now.
So the question arises: Who controls the majority and who decides what the
majority must know and what not??

>4. OBJECTIVES and WORK of the U.L.T.
>
>These are two, as already stated many times, detailed and
>defined:
>
>1. to keep the message and teachings of "ORIGINAL"
>THEOSOPHY as expressed by Mme. Blavatsky and her colleague and


Bla, bla, bla. Smacks a little bit sectarian. When I speaks with old
Communists from East Germany they quote me from Karl Marx how much liberty
the worker has. What counts is the reality, not the paper dreams.

Furthermore, the ULT is not true its own object as Katherine Tingley has
true to HPB in every esoteric sense of the word. Why then is KT ignored?
Who decides in the ULT who is original and who is not??
Why is Robert Crosbie original to HPB and KT not?
Where are the proofs?
Frank