Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00175)

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/bushcheney.html



##-----Original Message-----
##From: leonmaurer@aol.com [mailto:leonmaurer@aol.com] 
##Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2001 6:40 AM
##To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
##Subject: Re: Theos-World beginner's query
##
##
##All the more reason to go back to the study of theosophy 
##solely as presented 
##by the Ancient Masters in the book of Dzyan, and thoroughly 
##covered, along 
##with all commentaries and comparative religious references, 
##in the original 
##writings of HPB. From such study, one can form their own 
##decisions on who of 
##the later "interpreters" that came after Blavatsky are right 
##or wrong. 
##
##It seems that among all the diverse TM groups, only ULT -- 
##not an organized 
##"theosophical society," but as a free association of 
##independent students 
##whose only obligation is "that which they, themselves (individually) 
##determine" -- sanctions this truly occult and free thinking approach. 
##
##This, along with the yoga meditational practices taught by 
##Patanjali coupled 
##with the yoga teachings of Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita ( explained 
##thoroughly for English speaking students by WQJ and RC) -- 
##and barring a 
##living Master who can give "mouth to ear" instruction -- is 
##the only way to 
##achieve "initiation" and true self realization or 
##enlightenment in this age 
##of deafening, confusing and spiritually drowning 
##materialism... All, further 
##exacerbated by the jockeying for position, disciples, and 
##money by the 
##myriad's of false "New Age" prophets, "gurus," theosophical 
##reinterpreters, 
##and organized religion (or politically) oriented 
##neo-theosophical pundits -- 
##who drown us in further mental confusion. 
##
##I hope we can all (including this and other online forums) 
##soon get off this 
##incessant argumentation about past organizational and 
##personal history, and 
##get back down to the basic study and understanding of pure 
##theosophy -- along 
##with discussing its practical applications (both individually and 
##collectively) in awakening "the group Mind of the race" to 
##the true nature of 
##reality and the full understanding of the scientific basis 
##and true purpose 
##and meaning of "karma" and "reincarnation" -- as originally 
##purposed by HPB 
##in her three objects of the TS, as well as in her "Messages 
##to American 
##Theosophists." (Which I suggest we all go back to and reassess.)
##
##LHM 
##
##In a message dated 07/18/01 10:34:06 AM, ringding@blinx.de writes:
##
##>>I am very much a new student of theosophy and although
##>>I understand the works of HPB and others there is one
##>>thing I am confused about which I hope someone can
##>>clarify for me: what is the difference between the
##>>different theosophy societies, such as DES and ULT,
##>>and why there is a difference.
##>>
##>>mic
##>
##>There were many Theosophists who claimed to have their 
##teachings from 
##>direct communication with the Masters. Nevertheless they all 
##>contradict. So only one side could be right as there is but 
##one Truth 
##>on not two or more. Each lineage believes they are genuine and the 
##>others are frauds.
##>
##>At Adyar Besant and Leadbeater claimed to have 
##communications from the 
##>Masters. ULT, Point Loma, Pasadena believe they lie.
##>
##>Point Loma, Pasadena and ULT say that Judge and HPB are 
##genuine. Adyar 
##>says Judge lies and HPB perhaps also (at least Adyar spreads 
##teachings 
##>which are
##>opposite to HPB).
##>
##>Point Loma and Pasadena say that Tingley and Purucker had genuine 
##>communication with the Masters. ULT and Adyar believe not.
##>
##>Pasadena says Long and Conger had genuine communication with the 
##>Masters. Point Loma, ULT and Adyar believe not. Frank
##
## 
##
##Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
##http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
##
##