Theos-Talk Archives (June 2001 Message tt00029)

Frank:

Please see my comments below.

...doss

At 11:58 PM 6/7/01 +0200, you wrote:
> Dear Doss and Dallas,
>
> perhaps my English is too bad, but that's not my point.
> I agree with that you both wrote.
> But I was trying to offer an explanation how Boris could have seen it.
> I don't say it is right or wrong.
> Please read my text again.
>
> I was trying to say that there are rumours that Boris may have possibly
> felt his inner duty to reveil something, considering that to his
> understanding
> the great majority of students of present day may have become unworth
> for the deeper esoteric knowledge.
It is quite possible that you may be correct in your conclusion about 
Boris. But, for me there are some serious questions.

I am sure that there is much in HPB's writings that can be understand by 
one with a deep spiritual perception and those items of details for which 
the public may not have been ready may already been veiled by the Adepts 
who were behind much of HPB''s writings. As the original writings are 
already in print, anyone interested can get hold of them and the cat is out 
of the hat and cannot be put back. So however much Z may have been sincere 
and may have been right, I think I will still go with the originals at the 
same time be open to any new material anyone puts out. But to edit or 
censor or veil something in the original works is something I would not 
support.


> HPB once said about the Gautama Buddha that in his compassion he gave
> too much of the teachings and later regretted it.
> Perhaps a simliar situation for Boris who may have felt the same with the
> modern theosophical teachings.
While he may be sincere in his assumption, I still question any 
organisation backing such editing and present the material as orginal 
material to the unsuspecting novices.

mkr


> We know it for a fact that there is a huge bulk of higher, esoteric
> theosophical
> teachings existsing on the outer plane, but unknown even to the theosophical
> public. Who is that possible? The only satisfying explanation to me is that
> we
> are not ready for them.
>
> We know that HPB wrote a history of the mystery schools of the past.
> The texts are not there. Why?
>
> We know that Purucker planned too to write the story of the mystery schools.
> And there were many other plans too. Why do we not have it?
> An answer limited to the restrictions of the physical plane, problems to
> find
> good coworkers, money etc. is not enough seen with theosophical eyes.
> Hope, that makes a little bit clearer what I want to say.
> Frank