Theos-Talk Archives (June 2001 Message tt00027)

Dear Doss:

I agree 100% on this point.

No one is conceivably so proud and arrogant as to interpose
themselves between H.P.B. and the Masters who brought us
THEOSOPHY the SNATANA DHARMA -- the eternal doctrine -

Those who believe this have not studied the ORIGINALS thoroughly
or made the necessary correlations that anyone can make. They
are in a hurry and apparently seek to draw in others who want a
"Quick way" to SPIRITUAL WISDOM.

The only way we can calm and pacify our intermediate PSYCHIC
nature (fueled by Kama - desires and passions) is by
universalizing and impersonalizing our views - and this means to
change and also to purify all our motives.

There has been a current ongoing research on CONSCIOUSNESS and a
number of interesting things have emerged.

Who and what is the 'WE" that directs and channels the MIND ?
How is this to be done? What is the Goal we ought to seek? How
and why do we make choices? How does Karma attach itself to us
through our choices?

Best wishes,

Dallas

=====

.

-----Original Message-----
From: ramadoss@infohwy.com [mailto:ramadoss@infohwy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:30 AM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Theos-World original versus Boris de Zirkoff
editions of THE SECRET DOCTRINE

I beg to differ on this issue. It is the right of everyone of us
to put
forward what our understanding of the facts presented in the
original works
of HPB and others. When the question of "correction" or "editing"
for what
ever reason comes up, how are we sure that the editing is
improving the
understanding. It is not unlike an world reknowned Professor of
English
trying to edit Shakespeare's plays to improve them. It is in the
best
interests of everyone to leave the originals intact and not
tamper with them.

___MKR___

At 12:28 PM 6/6/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>I have been told the story that Boris edited so many terms
because he has
>had good reason to do so. A higher chela can regognize moments
when it is
>necessary to reveil more then to unveil. Perhaps Boris has seen
that the
>theosophical philosophy is on the descending arc and becomes
more and more
>corrupt. Then someone who feels his duty could come to a
situation where he
>decides to keep the teachings clean before the unwise.
>Could that be an explanation?
>Frank




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/