Theos-Talk Archives (March 2001 Message tt00002)

> >Of course, if one follows Blavatsky and the Mahatmas, then one knows:
> >NOBODY has the correct interpretation of Theosophy. Yet. And for the
> >foreseeable future.
> 
> Bart, does that include also HPB and the Masters too?

>Well, unless they are liars, yes.

The same I heard last week in our local Adyar "Blavatsky (!)-lodge": No oneknows the truth and don't read the Secret Doctrine and the Mahatma Letters.
As the so-called Adyar TS rejects the truth at least since 1885 when they kicked HPB out it seems that the Theosophists are in danger to become persecuted by the dugpas WITHIN.
As HPB as the Masters told us they know the truth and the way to it, then they are liars according to your definition. Does that include also that theAdyar TS is a fake TS and misuses the name, seal and motto? Why not honestand rename it to Psychological Society?

Furthermore, Bart, your statement sounds a little bit proud. All you can say is that you don't know the truth. But how can you know wether others knowthe truth? Is it not possible that there are people who know more than you? Or do you consider yourself as the crown of creation?
Frank