Theos-Talk Archives (March 2001 Message tt00001)

In a message dated 2/28/2001 9:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
bartl@sprynet.com writes:

> Well, when one considers that the "secret doctrine" (the doctrine
> itself as opposed to Blavatsky's book about the secret doctrine) is the
> correct interpretation of Theosophy, then Blavatsky didn't have it, the
> Mahatmas didn't have it, and certainly those who came later didn't have
> it. 

Deeper and deeper we go Bart. How can we know if the actual "secret doctrine" 
is the "correct interpretation" if it's very secrecy, prohibits us from 
knowing anything at all about it? 

Louis