Theos-Talk Archives (November 2000 Message tt00156)

Dear Sham,

Thanks a lot. I'm quite sure that you meant me no harm in any way, in 
trying to make your particular point. To put things more in context, 
why not begin again: by going back to my message, number 455 I think it 
is, the one you took the small piece from in order to express your 
idea, and click on "Reply" to the whole message. Move it down a little, 
and then above that, which will include both my reply to Sherab, and 
his or her message, and then expand on your original thoughts, which 
was a good food-for-thought point to begin with.

Most sincerely,

Compiler
-------

--- In theos-talk@egroups.com, Shampan-e-Shindh <shampan@z...> wrote:
> My apologies. Yes it was most "careless" of me, specially on such a serious
> point of discussion. I should have taken the whole paragraph.
> 
> Compiler wrote:
> 
> > Sham,
> >
> > May I suggest that you "reply" to the entire message, or at least the whole
> > paragraph, that you lifted the below very small hanging-alone piece of mine
> > that you copied, so that it all shows. This way the whole thing is in
> > context, to be considered by everyone. It wasn't very long to begin with
> > and dealt with a fairly important theosophic topic. I may be wrong, but I
> > think you would offer the readers something of much more substance to
> > contemplete that was more in context, than the few selected isolated words
> > that you used under my name, to make your point. Just offered as something
> > to think about.
> >
> > Compiler
> > -------
> >
> > Shampan -e-Shindh wrote:
> >
> > > --- In theos-talk@egroups.com, Compiler <compiler@w...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Theosophic statement, assuming that it is true, until proven
> > > otherwise,
> > >
> > > What can proven wrong today, can be proven otherwise tomorrow.
> > >
> > > -Sham
> > > (plenty of examples in the past, so I a bit brave on this one<grin>)
> > >
> >
> >
> > eGroups Sponsor
> 
> >