Theos-Talk Archives (June 2000 Message tt00069)

> >DAVID: "I think that, the obvious disctintion between the two
> >Maitreyas, requires some kind of proof from Govert, too.  Or at least, some
> >commentary."
> >
> >GOVERT: My belief that the real Maitreya communicated through David Anrias is
> >based on the following intricately connected factors:
> >
> >1) Cyril Scott presented Anrias as a genuine contact with the Masters.
> >2) Based on his 'Initiate' books and his book on music I consider Scott
> himself
etc.etc.


DAVID: > But these aren't really proofs......are they?  If I might say, they
appear
> to be conjecture, heresay, speculation and, at most, an educated guess
> based upon, perhaps, intuition.  It can be as easily dimissed as what *I*
> have offered as my "opinion" about the externalization of Maitreya and the
> Hierarchy at this time according to Benjamin Creme.

GOVERT: You are right. All these considerations are justifications for a certain
theosophical theology. They should maybe be named 'subjective proofs.' That's
how I experience
the little tidbits here and there that I find and which seem to fit neatly into,
and sometimes even strengthen, my belief. It's certainly not all facts and
evidence, as Aryel claims for his position.




-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.