Theos-Talk Archives (June 2000 Message tt00011)

Ahhh;evolution!
M K Ramadoss wrote:
> 
> This is an issue the K himself addressed.
> 
> He may have reached whatever transformation he had with a great amount of
> effort, while he stated that instant transformation is possible for anyone
> who tries. He gave the example of the great risk and time and trouble that
> Columbus had to go through when he travelled by ship to the America. Today,
> most take the easy method of taking a commercial airline flight. So he did
> not have a double standard.
> 
> Something to think about.
> 
> mkr
> 
> At 06:51 PM 05/31/2000 -0500, you wrote: quoting:
> 
> >Regarding the feasibility of Krishnamurti’s suggestion of a profound
> fundamental transformation of
> the human consciousness, it has to be pointed out that Krishnamurti did not
> arrive at that level of
> consciousness by way of his own proposed instantaneous ‘non-method.’(16)
> He arrived there solely
> by treading first the path of initiation under a Master (17)--going almost
> to its final conclusion--then
> stepped aside, and denounced the whole method.(18)
> <
> 
> -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com
> 
> Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
> teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
> "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.

-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.